this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2024
1133 points (99.1% liked)
Funny
6996 readers
669 users here now
General rules:
- Be kind.
- All posts must make an attempt to be funny.
- Obey the general sh.itjust.works instance rules.
- No politics or political figures. There are plenty of other politics communities to choose from.
- Don't post anything grotesque or potentially illegal. Examples include pornography, gore, animal cruelty, inappropriate jokes involving kids, etc.
Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
A train of 8000 tons at a velocity of 30 km/h roughly has the kinetic energy of 66.39 kg TNT.
Supposedly 100 kg TNT
~~I don't think your units make sense
kinetic energy has units of energy, but "kg TNT per second" is power (about 4MW). (I think just remove the "every second" and it's correct?)~~
Edit: parent edited comment.
You're right, but "every second" was meant more as a display of the energy in the train, like a large explosion "every second". Is that very wrong?
Hmmm, I'm not sure I understand...
A large explosion every second has units of power, not energy. So to me this is suggesting that the train is putting out power equal to its kinetic energy per second. That's certainly not the case
it implies that the train is powerful enough to accelerate to the speed in 1s, which is definitely not true.
But that's just my interpretation.
Yeah, I forgot that a large part of the energy is in inertia and not the pulling of the engine.