this post was submitted on 15 Dec 2024
1006 points (96.7% liked)

Science Memes

11440 readers
1195 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] naught101@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Solar and wind are currently both cheaper than coal, and rapidly getting cheaper.

Nuclear is more expensive, and the cost is growing. There will be almost certainly be no private investment in nuclear in the future unless it's ideologically driven.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cost_of_electricity_by_source

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago

Come on let’s get some price breaks on the solar towers!

I totally know what solar towers are

Wiki: Eye of Sauron

[–] Shiggles@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

almost certainly no private investment in nuclear in the future

I too refuse to read any news, ever, if it doesn’t support my viewpoint. Definitely no current investments in nuclear at the moment.

I like wind and solar! They’re not the whole of the solution for the whole globe though. There’s no reason to keep spreading the fossil fuel industry’s propaganda for them.

[–] naught101@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Sorry, I meant to say new private investment

[–] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Nuclear is more expensive, and the cost is growing. There will be almost certainly be no private investment in nuclear in the future unless it’s ideologically driven.

even if this is the case, i still think it's a good idea to at least invest in research and development in nuclear fission, which might even help fusion down the road. Not to mention it's always good to have alternatives. Would be a shame if we found out that solar panels are actually the new asbestos or something silly.

[–] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The only problems with solar are incoming president McFuckface’s tariffs, and AI’s propensity to use every goddamn moving electron in the world.

the AI problem is irrelevant to solar. The tariffs definitely don't help, plus we already have a raw materials import ban from china as well, so that's cool.

Really doesn't help that china has basically an entire market monopoly on rare earth materials.