this post was submitted on 15 Dec 2024
35 points (66.7% liked)

Showerthoughts

30049 readers
850 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. A showerthought should offer a unique perspective on an ordinary part of life.

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. Avoid politics
    • 3.1) NEW RULE as of 5 Nov 2024, trying it out
    • 3.2) Political posts often end up being circle jerks (not offering unique perspective) or enflaming (too much work for mods).
    • 3.3) Try c/politicaldiscussion, volunteer as a mod here, or start your own community.
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
vatlark@lemmy.world
forkball@lemmy.world
quinten@lemmy.world
Thekingoflorda@lemmy.world
35
In a hundred years or so we'll be explaining that it's okay to be a billionaire (lemmy.nz)
submitted 1 week ago by dragonfucker@lemmy.nz to c/showerthoughts@lemmy.world
22 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

In a hundred and twenty or thirty years or something, the dollar will have inflated by 1000 times, so a billion dollars then will be equal to a million dollars now. It'll cost a billion dollars for a nice four bedroom house.

But we'll have had a hundred more years to produce anti billionaire propaganda, so a lot of people, especially teenagers, will need it explained to them that being a billionaire isn't so bad now. The Marxist-Leninists will all be saying that Cyborg Bernie Sanders is an evil billionaire, and us reasonable leftists will be explaining that a billion dollars is just what it costs these days to own a residence in your home state and also in DC, which is necessary for working as a senator.

What we'll really need to look out for by then is the trillionaires. Good for nothing parasites. There's no excuse for one person to own a trillion dollars while there are people living on the streets who can't even afford a measly ten thousand dollars for a cheeseburger meal.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SouthEndSunset@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Twenty one States on that list had a minimum wage figure of 7.25, who cares about an average.

[–] Saik0Shinigami@lemmy.saik0.com 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Because those states are small population wise, any attempt to push 7.25 as "normal" on an international forum is disingenuous. treating an issues that is distinct on a state hy state issue as if the federal is the end all be all is a lie of omission. Those same 21 states also have a lower cost of living.

[–] SouthEndSunset@lemm.ee -2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

But if you were asked, what is the USA minimum wage, you’d say 7.25. Anything else is irrelevant.

[–] Saik0Shinigami@lemmy.saik0.com 1 points 1 week ago

No. I wouldn't. Because minimum wage varies wherever you are in the USA. Where I live it's over $13, nearly double. It would be disingenuous to claim 7.25 when literally nobody I know is at that rate.

That's my point. Stop pushing the shit narrative. Statistically, you don't know a single soul that's at 7.25 either. Comparing the UK minimum wage, a country with 1/5th the population and 1/40th the landmass... Acting like the all of the USA is a monolith like the UK is disingenuous.