this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2024
464 points (94.8% liked)

Technology

60112 readers
2055 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] nucleative@lemmy.world 96 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Bluesky is being run by a funded professional startup team and is aimed at the masses. Mastodon is run by activists and software devs and brings in other like minded folks.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 26 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Bluesky has an advertising budget. Bluesky has an entire team just working on User Interface.

The fact that people are so lazy that they keep going for the corporate-sure-to-enshittify options shows how little people actually care about escaping corporate control of their lives.

"It's not my job to contribute to a community project" is just another way to say "it's not my job to make the world a better place."

[–] Souroak@lemmy.sdf.org 18 points 1 week ago

It's generally easier for the layperson to pay a gym membership than it is to have the upfront cost of a barbell set and coordinating a schedule with their neighbor who owns a treadmill.

I don't want to sound too pro-corporate, I just don't want to fault others when they fall for the veneer of a "cohesive product." It takes a lot of work to organize a community project and why it's so special when they do come together.

[–] damnedfurry@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

The fact that people are so lazy that they keep going for the corporate-sure-to-enshittify options shows how little people actually care about escaping corporate control of their lives.

It's not that deep.

People want to go where other people are. A tiny minority of them are even aware of the things that are influencing your decisions. Not a single moment is spent thinking about whether X or Y is more 'corporately controlled' before deciding to join a new platform.

[–] Bronzebeard@lemm.ee 5 points 1 week ago

Mastodon is confusing as shit though. They could have made is not as confusing, but this is what happens when you get backend only developers designing the front end of a product.

[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Most importantly, Mastodon doesn't have the funding. It always astounds me how people miss that part.

Money lets you fix a lot of problems. Not all. But many.

Of course, it doesn't mean they'll succeed. Google+ had lots of money, too.

[–] Bronzebeard@lemm.ee 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Ugh, Google+ was so much better than Facebook. The whole circles concept was a game changer for social media that no one else has really adopted in a meaningful way. Half the reason millennials began to leave Facebook was not wanting their parents seeing what they're posting, so being able to decide which group can see a particular post was an awesome idea.

Sadly it just never got the adoption

[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago

That concept was actually pioneered by a Diaspora (where they were called "aspects"). The strange thing was that Google kept removing functionality from the circles and making them harder to use. I think towards the end they removed them entirely.