this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2024
90 points (88.8% liked)

Fediverse

28744 readers
50 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
ruud@lemmy.world
TragicNotCute@lemmy.world
Xylinna@lemmy.world
MrCenny@lemmy.world
automodbeta@lemmy.world
woelkchen@lemmy.world
90
Do you think the mostly limited range of political views is a strength or a weakness of Lemmy? (For example, in terms of attracting new users.) (feddit.nl)
submitted 2 weeks ago by crimeschneck@feddit.nl to c/fediverse@lemmy.world
257 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Sure, there are always outliers and you can correct me if I'm wrong, but that's just the overall impression I have.

(I wasn't sure if !asklemmy@lemmy.world or this community would fit better for this kind of question, but I assume it fits here.)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] granolabar@kbin.melroy.org 5 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Half of Lemmy working to ensure that we never get any diversity of opinions or anymore normal people lol

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Oh no, the poor right whingers aren’t being represented here.

Oh wait, good. Fuck ‘em.

[–] granolabar@kbin.melroy.org 3 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

They still have to suffer from shiti health insurance...

But sure let's make sure nobody but a good neo libs "allies" are permitted here champ

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

In your country sure.

And who the fuck wants neo libs here? Neo libs (and libs) are right wing ideologies.

[–] OpenStars@piefed.social 2 points 1 week ago

Totally. Maybe we should invent some kind of... oh I dunno, ideological purity test? Surely that would not eat our faces off, hrm? Surely we can exclude only "them", while keeping "us".

Smh, it's always the same. People don't even see it.

[–] Chozo@fedia.io 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Weird seeing you again, and seeing you say this, after you quickly resorted to name-calling over a disagreement in another thread just 20 minutes ago. Do you really not think that you're a member of the half you refer to? I'm not so sure you actually want "diversity of opinions" or "normal people" if that's been your response so far.

[–] granolabar@kbin.melroy.org 3 points 2 weeks ago

You took a bad position, I clarified why it was unfounded.

That's called a discussion. You are entitled to post your opinion, I am entitled to provide a rebuttal.

That's how discourse works.