People Twitter

5398 readers

1623 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

Mark NSFW content.
No doxxing people.
Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
No bullying or international politcs
Be excellent to each other.
Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

SendMeYourTaTas@sh.itjust.works

pelespirit@sh.itjust.works

429

e-mail in the AI era (sh.itjust.works)

submitted 2 weeks ago by Joker@sh.itjust.works to c/whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works

25 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Mastodon.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Maalus@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It's on average maybe 5x more than a google search. A 300W GPU running for a minute won't be a blip on your energy bill. What is costly is training, which is usually not done often.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

That said, data centers as a whole are something like 1% of the global electricity use. So while AI may use a lot of energy relative to what you're getting, it's really not a ton in the grand scheme of things.

If the goal is to reduce electricity usage, there are bigger fish to fry. If the goal is to stop the small fish from getting too large w/o providing value, then go ahead, guilt away.

[–] Maalus@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah, exactly my point. It's more useful than harmful and it is a miniscule impact compared to other things. Enviro people have just latched onto AI as if it's the greatest evil ever, with lots of embelishments and straight up lies about its power usage.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Eh, I'm not so sure about the useful vs harmful tradeoff, but it's certainly not harming anything AFAICT. In fact, they'll be super motivated to get cheap, reliable electricity as it grows, so expect more investments like reopening 3-mile island, solar energy storage, etc. It could end up being a net win climate-wise (probably not), but in any case, it's not what's causing climate change.

If we want to address climate change, we need to address the 500lb gorillas in the room: transportation. Anything else, IMO, is a distraction.

[–] Maalus@lemmy.world -3 points 2 weeks ago

Again, 5x the electricity of a single google search is nothing and it produces incredible results. Overall it is a tiny blip compared to anything else.