I use a Mac precisely because it lets me do what I want. Linux is endless configuration and poorly designed UIs, Windows is an incoherent mess that needs to be wrestled back to a usable state with every major update. Mac does what I need without any fuss.

Truth be told, I have a PC for gaming and a Linux server for Plex, *arr, and home automation. But when I need to get work done, it’s the MacBook. No question.

[–] astrsk@fedia.io 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

This is the key difference people miss in this discussion. Being able to do the things you want varies so wildly but the system gets out of the way entirely to let you do things. Not sit and endlessly tweak configurations. While for some that might be what they want to do and believe me macOS also has endless configuration parameters to tweak, the class majority just want to do things with the computer as a tool. It’s a subtle nuance but you said it well, it specifically lets you do whatever you want. Editing configs for hours to customize the desktop environment is not the same as being productive with the system.

[–] Jumuta@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

have you tried mint

that's the stereotype a lot of people believe but it's just false imo

if your hardware is compatible, then it's as simple as any other os

[–] astrsk@fedia.io 2 points 2 weeks ago

I’ve been daily driving Debian and arch for over a decade lol.

[–] GuyFleegman@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 weeks ago

Mint is very good. Seriously. If I had to daily drive Linux on the desktop, I’d use Mint. But even Mint is a far cry from a Mac in terms of usability and software compatibility.

I’d also have to go back to x86-64 to use Mint, and that’s a big step in the wrong direction. I’m sure that won’t always be the case, but at the moment, the ARM Linux situation is still quite fragmented.