this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2024
72 points (87.5% liked)

PC Gaming

8800 readers
100 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
EXiLExJD@lemmy.ca
UncleBadTouch@lemmy.ca
KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
72
Intel researchers create a method for AI-generating frames in games without added input latency (www.pcgamer.com)
submitted 2 weeks ago by alessandro@lemmy.ca to c/pcgaming@lemmy.ca
27 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

I think you are misunderstanding, because I agree with you when the games minimum hardware requirements are met.

I am saying I hope this technology can be used so that hardware that is below minimum requirements could potentially still get decently playable framerates using this technology on newer titles. The obvious drawback being decreased visual quality. I agree that upscaling, particularly TAA and its related effects, should not be used to reduce system requirements because the developers do not design their game well or make use of ugly effects. But I think this can be useful for old systems or perhaps only integrated graphics chips depending on how the technology works. That was what I meant. Sorry I was not clear enough initially.