Privacy

32482 readers

213 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
Don't promote proprietary software
Try to keep things on topic
If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
Be nice :)

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

779

Revolut, McDonald's, and Authy have banned the use of GrapheneOS. (grapheneos.org)

submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by Sunny@slrpnk.net to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

332 comments fedilink hide all child comments

cross-posted from: https://slrpnk.net/post/15995282

Real unfortunate news for GrapheneOS users as Revolut has decided to ban the use of 'non-google' approved OSes. This is currently being posted about and updated by GrahpeneOS over at Bluesky for those who want to follow it more closely.

Edit: had to change the title, originally it said Uber too but I cannot find back to the source of ether that's true or not..

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Samsy@lemmy.ml 29 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

That's correct, but not the reason grapheneOS chooses only pixel phones. It's the level of hardware security features.

[–] XTL@sopuli.xyz 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Also unlockable and presumably has well working builds. It's not just graphene, but just about every Android project it there that's best supported on pixels. Other manufacturers have a crazy variety of locking schemes and required tools. Each one is a nightmare to support.

[–] orange@communick.news 14 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

For GrapheneOS, it's primarily that it's re-lockable. That's why other unlockable phones aren't supported.

The GrapheneOS install process sets new OS signing keys so you can lock the phone again and get full verified boot. However, most manufacturers haven't implemented this feature.

[–] XTL@sopuli.xyz 4 points 2 weeks ago

Yes, that cuts the list down even more.

[–] fuzzzerd@programming.dev 1 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

What do you get, app/feature wise for verified boot vs. Play integrity app? Does it increase the amount of apps that work on it?

[–] orange@communick.news 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

No, Play Integrity intentionally checks if it's a Google-approved key. Android itself has an API to check verified boot and gives info on the signing key - most devs just want to know verified boot is working.

I feel Play Integrity has a short life ahead of if competition authorities realise how exactly it works. "Anti-competitive" is the first thing policy-minded folks think when I explain the API to them.

[–] fuzzzerd@programming.dev 1 points 1 week ago

Hope you're right, because it basically spells the end of customizing.

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 1 points 2 weeks ago

I would guess that it allows to detect tampering if you have to give your phone to the security officers and they do or don't do something with it without you present. I heard of such occurrences on the border, but this happens in other places and countries, too. Not sure if locked bootloader would help, though