this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2024
198 points (99.0% liked)

United States | News & Politics

2031 readers
981 users here now

Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

Post anything related to the United States.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
simsymbiote@midwest.social
Type1@midwest.social
198
Trump Says He’ll Issue an Executive Order Ending Birthright Citizenship — a Constitutionally Protected Right (truthout.org)
submitted 2 weeks ago by Garibaldee@lemm.ee to c/usa@midwest.social
68 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] plz1@lemmy.world 51 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)
  1. He doesn't care about Constitutionally-protected rights
  2. He'll do this anyways, because it tees up a Supreme Court case on a fast track, or Congress just lets it happen.
  3. He wins either way
[–] makyo@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

3b. He loves having these fights because he can say 'BUT THE IMMIGRANTS' and MAGA, because they don't actually understand anything about the American constitution or law, will back him because they'll believe it's just a bunch of liberals protecting criminal aliens.

[–] _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The Supreme Court already ruled against birthright citizenship. The 14 Amendment overturned their decision. And Congress doesn’t have a say in the matter, because a constitutional amendment has to be approved by a supermajority of the states.

I get that people are in a bleak mood, but there are limits to what Trump and republicans can do.

[–] ECB@feddit.org 2 points 2 weeks ago

That's true, but I think a lot of Americans tend to think of the constitution as being more powerful than it actually is.

Just like any other set of rules, it mostly comes down to how these are interpreted. The constitution itself had no autonomy... it depends on everyone agreeing on a certain interpretation of the words as well as agreeing to enforce this interpretation.

I'm not saying that it is logical or consistent, but the wording "...and subject to the jurisdiction thereof..." in the 14th amendment could have some VERY warped interpretations, if you really wanted to force it...