Technology

60112 readers

2187 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

458

The GPT Era Is Already Ending (www.theatlantic.com)

submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by cyrano@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/technology@lemmy.world

159 comments fedilink hide all child comments

If this is the way to superintelligence, it remains a bizarre one. “This is back to a million monkeys typing for a million years generating the works of Shakespeare,” Emily Bender told me. But OpenAI’s technology effectively crunches those years down to seconds. A company blog boasts that an o1 model scored better than most humans on a recent coding test that allowed participants to submit 50 possible solutions to each problem—but only when o1 was allowed 10,000 submissions instead. No human could come up with that many possibilities in a reasonable length of time, which is exactly the point. To OpenAI, unlimited time and resources are an advantage that its hardware-grounded models have over biology. Not even two weeks after the launch of the o1 preview, the start-up presented plans to build data centers that would each require the power generated by approximately five large nuclear reactors, enough for almost 3 million homes.

https://archive.is/xUJMG

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

People writing off AI because it isn’t fully replacing humans. Sounds like writing off calculators because they can’t work without human input.

Used correctly and in the right context, it can still significantly increase productivity.

[–] Jyek@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Except it has gotten progressively worse as a product due to misuse, corporate censorship of the engine and the dataset feeding itself.

[–] surph_ninja@lemmy.world -3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah, the leash they put it on to keep it friendly towards capitalists is the biggest thing holding it back right now.

[–] silasmariner@programming.dev 4 points 2 weeks ago

'Jesse, what the fuck are you talking about'.jpg

[–] Eranziel@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

No, this is the equivalent of writing off calculators if they required as much power as a city block. There are some applications for LLMs, but if they cost this much power, they're doing far more harm than good.

[–] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Imagine if the engineers for computers were just as short sighted. If they had stopped prioritizing development when computers were massive, room sized machines with limited computing power and obscenely inefficient.

Not all AI development is focused on increasing complexity. Much is focused on refinement, and increasing efficiency. And there’s been a ton of progress in this area.

[–] Eranziel@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

This article and discussion is specifically about massively upscaling LLMs. Go follow the links and read OpenAI's CEO literally proposing data centers which require multiple, dedicated grid-scale nuclear reactors.

I'm not sure what your definition of optimization and efficiency is, but that sure as heck does not fit mine.

[–] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

Sounds like you’re only reading a certain narrative then. There’s plenty of articles about increasing efficiency, too.