this post was submitted on 03 Dec 2024
609 points (99.7% liked)

World News

39385 readers
2496 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Vietnam’s High People’s Court upheld the death sentence for real estate tycoon Truong My Lan, convicted of embezzlement and bribery in a record $12 billion fraud case.

Lan can avoid execution by returning $9 billion (three-quarters of the stolen funds), potentially reducing her sentence to life imprisonment.

Her crimes caused widespread economic harm, including a bank run and $24 billion in government intervention to stabilize the financial system.

Lan has admitted guilt but prosecutors deemed her actions unprecedentedly damaging. She retains limited legal recourse through retrial procedures.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] GhiLA@sh.itjust.works 26 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Revolutions aren't pillow fights.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 11 points 3 weeks ago

True, but they’re demands of a better world. There’s a difference between killing in a revolution and a 60 year old communist government executing an embezzler instead of giving her life in prison

[–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The state ending someone's life for breaking its laws and then having people here who would normally condemn the use of capital punishment compare it to a revolution and call it justified just because the state in question claims to be socialist is just so uniquely Lemmy.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

is just so uniquely Lemmy.

Lol read a fucking book, if the left has been consistent about one thing throughout history, is constant infighting and bickering.

Nothing you've said is unique to Lemmy. Except maybe the part about making uninformed comments with extreme confidence.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 weeks ago

That's consistent across all social media!

[–] hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

This is not a revolution. It's the state killing a person. The death penalty is ALWAYS unacceptable, without expections. Do I want billionares to die? Hell yes! Do I think the state should have the power to kill people? Hell no!

[–] bluewing@lemm.ee 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

So you are a more hands on type. You are fine with the killing if it's you as a a worker class pulling the trigger.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

They didn't say that. I think it's pretty clear what they mean. The state has a monopoly on violence. They are permitted a certain amount of force in order to keep the peace. When a government misuses that power, or oversteps to the point of deciding who gets to live or die, then it's gone too far.

If you can't understand the difference between a regular worker being possibly oppressed by this misuse of force, and the state apparatus itself, then I really don't know what to tell you.

[–] bluewing@lemm.ee 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I understand that the state has a monopoly on violence. Violence IS the ultimate power to rule no matter the form of government. What you don't understand is you can't limit that power. Once granted, even on what might appear to be a limited basis, and it's never limited for long, cannot be revoked. You can totally remove the power of the government to use violence and then hand that power to the populace-- but this is not a good idea. The only thing dumber than the government is the public.

The person I responded to stated plainly, they were for killing billionaires. They just didn't want the government to do it. So he must be willing to pull the trigger himself. Which is a valid political stance. Even though I think it's very misguided.

You have read into a plain statement something YOU believe. And if you don't understand that, then I don't know what to tell you either.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

you can’t limit that power. Once granted, even on what might appear to be a limited basis, and it’s never limited for long, cannot be revoked.

Simply untrue.

[–] bluewing@lemm.ee 1 points 3 weeks ago

Show me examples. And show that such examples haven't degraded over time.