this post was submitted on 02 Dec 2024
854 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

60112 readers
2297 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 4 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

The fact that this has USB type C as a option for powering it makes me very interested, but the fact that it does not have at least Wi-Fi 6E makes me not interested. So I think I will have to wait for version 2 of this.

[–] TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee 12 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

Oh come on, don’t knock the router for not being the best access point. That’s not what it’s for.

[–] MehBlah@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago

The best routers don't have any WiFi.

[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

If I remember correctly, Wi-Fi 6E was finalized in like 2021 or 2022, and it's 2024 and very close to 2025. So it should be about three years that Wi-Fi 6E has been in the wild. I only have 500 MBPS fiber anyway so I wouldn't saturate the links but I do want the six gigahertz Wi-Fi band because if I'm going to buy a new router I'm going to probably keep it for like 10 years. I think I purchased my previous router in like 2019 and I'm still using it. My router is an appliance that I only replace when the damn thing breaks pretty much.

[–] TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee 10 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I’m saying that your router and access point should be separate devices anyway, especially if you don’t want to replace said router.

My router doesn’t have wireless at all. I have a dedicated WiFi 6 access point for that, if I want to go up to a newer standard I just replace the AP.

[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah, fair enough. I'm kind of an intermediate user, because when I think of Access Point and Router, I think of the same device. But yet, I'm definitely a big advocate of open source software and hardware. But I do not self-host very much.

[–] TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee 1 points 3 weeks ago

Less about open source, more of just a practical stance. The thing about networking is that standards change all the time, and it’s better to have a single device serve a single role on the network than to cram all those functions into a combo box.

So an ideal network has a separate router, switch, and access point. Ideally two of each in redundant configurations but that’s not required for most people.

[–] RandomGen1@lemm.ee 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

In the us at least, you cannot have 6ghz operation and connectorized antennae like this unit has

[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 weeks ago

Okay, I didn't look closely enough at the device to notice that it had connector and 10 is instead of fixed antennas.