memes

10698 readers

2921 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civil

No trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politics

This is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent reposts

Check for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No bots

No bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads

No advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

!tenforward@lemmy.world : Star Trek memes, chat and shitposts
!lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world : Lemmy Shitposts, anything and everything goes.
!linuxmemes@lemmy.world : Linux themed memes
!comicstrips@lemmy.world : for those who love comic stories.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

Tenthrow@lemmy.world

The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world

The_Picard_Maneuver@startrek.website

1117

Warning (sh.itjust.works)

submitted 4 weeks ago by Joker@sh.itjust.works to c/memes@lemmy.world

130 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Source.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] MrKurteous@feddit.nu 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I don't know of any studies unfortunately, but I did want to point out that training is not quite a one time cost in practice, because training has already been done loads times and is still being done! I'm theory, if we stopped training all AI and just kept the ones we have, then indeed the training cost would be bounded just like you say, I'm just afraid we're quite far from that.

[–] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 weeks ago

this is true, but this is always going to lead to a different AI and a different product eventually, it's not like it's going to be sustained entirely by the whims of chatgpt 3.5 for example.