this post was submitted on 27 Nov 2024
1117 points (96.2% liked)

memes

10693 readers
2747 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] anus@lemmy.world 17 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

This is such a stupid take, the author is either a lemming or doesn't understand how resources and commodities work

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 15 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

If you don't explain why you hold this opinion your comment is wasted.

[–] todd_bonzalez@lemm.ee 26 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

A small city usually requires one gigawatt continuous power. 10 minutes of power is equal to 100k kWh.

A 200x200 GenAI image takes about 2 seconds on an RTX 3060 running at 170W. That 2 seconds of power is equal to 0.000094 kWh.

The meme is off by a factor of 1,063,829,787.

[–] kofe@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

So how many images would need to be generated at once to take down a city 👀

[–] AVincentInSpace@pawb.social 13 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

exactly 1,063,829,787, can't you read?

[–] RoidingOldMan@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

1,063,829,787

It would be that many times the squared volume of a 200x200 image. Which is already 40,000 pixels. Multiply those together and you get 4.25 million megapixels (which are 1 billion pixels each), aka 4.25 gigapixels. It's extremely large but not unachievable.

People are AI generating entire movies which are 24-30 pictures per second. Seems like you could hit really big numbers really really fast.

[–] AVincentInSpace@pawb.social 0 points 3 weeks ago

People are AI generating entire movies which are 24-30 pictures per second.

I don't think they're generating those movies in real time.

[–] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

because people just make shit up and post it on the internet, and other people content with making shit up and posting it on the internet go "wow good post"

and then nobody bothers fact checking anything ever.

like i understand the anti AI sentiment, but please do yourself a favor and use actually good arguments against it, not stupid arguments that make you look incompetent and silly.

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Also it's not a small city, merely a village. Not even a very nice one.

[–] Emerald@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Not a village. My gaming PC can generate a 200 x 200 avatar in seconds

[–] fedev@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

That being the case, let's have a couple of avatars.