this post was submitted on 24 Nov 2024
1516 points (92.4% liked)

Technology

60112 readers
2187 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] GamingChairModel@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Precisely, you need to use an adapter

No, it's not an adapter. It's literally just a cable with two different ends.

Unless you consider an ordinary USB-A to USB-B (or mini B or micro B) to be an "adapter," too.

[–] potustheplant@feddit.nl 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Is this a joke? That's literally the definition of an adapter.

Talking about the first part, of course. Adapting from usb- a to b is not adapting anything other than the physical connector. It's not the same as usb-c to hdmi or dp, for example.

[–] GamingChairModel@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Adapting from usb- a to b is not adapting anything other than the physical connector.

Neither is the DisplayPort cables I'm talking about, where one end is just USB-C, but the signal actually transmitted through the USB-C connector and the cable itself is the HBR/UHBR transmission mode of any other DisplayPort cable (whatever the combination of the two ends physical connectors, between full DisplayPort, mini DisplayPort, or USB-C). It's not "adapted" because the data signals aren't converted in any way.

So it's as much an "adapter" as a DP cable that is a mini one one side and a full size on the other.

[–] potustheplant@feddit.nl 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Technically, yes. However, show me a monitor that comes with a dp to usb-c cable. Included cables are 99% the same connector on botj ends. That means that you'd need to buy extra cables (or a hub) for all of you non usb-c ports/devices.

Which is unnecessary and also precisely my point.

[–] GamingChairModel@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Well, the last two monitors I bought didn't come with any signal cables at all, probably because the manufacturers don't need to presume whether the consumer prefers HDMI or DP, or whether the other side is full size, mini-DP/mini-HDMI, or USB-C alt mode. Just right there, that's 5 possibilities, each about as common as the others.

[–] potustheplant@feddit.nl 0 points 1 month ago

Well, that sucks. Mine came with an hdmi, a displayport cable ans a usb-a to usb-b 3.0 cable for the monitor's hub (it has an integrated kvm). To me it makes 100% sense to include at least 1 cable for each type of input in the monitor. If you're fine with getting short-changed by manufacturers then good for you, I guess.