this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2024
120 points (98.4% liked)
Programming Humor
2744 readers
3 users here now
Related Communities !programmerhumor@lemmy.ml !programmer_humor@programming.dev !programmerhumor@kbin.social !programming_horror@programming.dev
Other Programming Communities !programming@beehaw.org !programming@programming.dev !programming@lemmy.ml !programming@kbin.social !learn_programming@programming.dev !functional_programming@programming.dev !embedded_prog@lemmy.ml
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I agree with this.
"If I have seen further, it is because I stand on the shoulders of giants" -Bernard of Chartres
I disagree with this.
Certain small specific approaches or ideas are indeed from individuals and can be revolutionary. Carrying them to reality may indeed require the group, however. There danger is swinging too far away from individuality. You can get burdened with the concept that the only way to effect change or innovation is through a group, which also isn't true.
The inception of Linux is a great example. Unix had a long and storied history before Linus started creating Linux. However the barriers to creating a cheap/free/lightweight version of a Unix like operating system were overcome initially by one person. Just that very first version of Linux took many works of others prior, added to it, and augmented it, and elevated it enough to create a point of change. Everything that happened after is absolutely the group contribution that made it what it was today. However, for a moment, there was a single individual that moved it forward. That is worthy of recognition that it can occur.