this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2023
1321 points (91.1% liked)

Antiwork

3627 readers
1 users here now

A community for those who want to end work, are curious about ending work, want to get the most out of a work-free life, want more information on anti-work ideas and want personal help with their own jobs/work-related struggles.

The new place for c/antiwork@lemmy.fmhy.ml

This server is no longer working, and we had to move.

Active stats from all instances

Subscribers: 2.1k

Date Created: June 21, 2023

Library copied from reddit:
The Anti-Work Library 📚
Essential Reads

Start here! These are probably the most talked-about essays on the topic.

c/Antiwork Rules

Tap or click to expand

1. Server Main Rules

The main rules of the server will be enforced stringently. https://lemmy.world/

2. No spam or reposts + limit off topic comments

Spamming posts will be removed. Reposts will be removed with the exception of a repost becoming the main hub for discussion on that topic.

Off topic comments that do not pertain to the post at hand may be removed if it is deemed they contribute nothing and/or foster hostility at users. This mostly applies to political and religious debate, but can be applied to other things at the mod’s discretion.

3. Post must have Antiwork/ Work Reform explicitly involved

Post must have Antiwork/Work Reform explicitly involved in some capacity. This can be talking about antiwork, work reform, laws, and ext.

4. Educate don’t attack

No mocking, demeaning, flamebaiting, purposeful antagonizing, trolling, hateful language, false accusation or allegation, or backseat moderating is allowed. Don’t resort to ad hominem attacks against another user or insult other people, examples of violations would be going after the person rather than the stance they take.

If we feel the comment is uncalled for we will remove it. Stay civil and there won’t be problems.

5. No Advertising

Under no circumstance are you allowed to promote or advertise any product or service

6. No factually misleading informationContent that makes claims or implications that can be proven false or misleading will be removed.

7. Headlines

If the title of the post isn’t an original title of the article then the first thing in the body of the post should be an original title written in this format “Original title: {title here}”.

8. Staff Discretion

Staff can take disciplinary action on offenses not listed in the rules when a community member's actions or general conduct creates a negative experience for another player and/or the community.

It is impossible to list every example or variation of the rules. It is also impossible to word everything perfectly. Players are expected to understand the intent of the rules and not attempt to "toe the line" or use loopholes to get around the intent of the rule.


Other Communities

c/workreform@lemmy.world


Server status for big servers http://lemmy-status.org/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] protist@mander.xyz 42 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

There are serious ethical problems with a capitalist system, especially when it comes to the necessities of life, but there's also ample evidence that other economic systems in practice have been just as bad of not worse regarding food security, eg follow the history of the USSR from the Holodomor in the 1930s to empty grocery shelves and bread lines in the 1980s

[–] fidodo@lemm.ee 18 points 1 year ago

I view the problem as us treating a tool as a system of government. Capitalism is an incredibly powerful tool for increasing efficiency (real capitalism as in a healthy free market, not monopoly bullshit). But we should be using that tool to our benefit, not having that tool use us. We can use it as a tool without it being our basis of society. Also, capitalism is not self regulating. That's a bullshit myth created by elite monopolists. Unchecked capitalism leads to monopolies and monopolies are the antithesis of capitalism. We used to know that. We used to bust monopolies. We need to learn when and when not to use capitalism. Certain things need to be monopolies. Like transportation and the power grid. Since healthy competition cannot prosper we cannot make them capitalistic. We already need to recognize that capitalism is a tool for us to use. It's ok to break capitalism in special circumstances for the greater good, because the good of the people is more important than perpetuating capitalism. I think abolishing it leads to apathy and inefficiency, but worshipping it leads to inhumanity, and we're not even worshipping it properly because again, monopolies are not capitalism. Like all things in life it's about balance.

[–] lauha@lemmy.one 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I cannot comment on communism as there has not been a true communism in the world yet, but dictatorships sure have been bad.

[–] symcal@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)

No system be it either communism or capitalism can be applied 100%

If we compare today's capitalism it's only fair that we compare it to real world application of communism.

As a Pole that was raised in a country freshly out of this system I can only tell you that you would have to be mentally insane to ever consider communism and expect it to work even half as well is it should on paper.

[–] gmtom@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

But that's not a "real world application of communism" in fact in reality the USSR never even claimed to actually be a communist society, they were just ruled by the communist party.

Communism has a specific definition, primarily its a post scarcity society, with no centralised government or monetary system. So any system that doesn't meet that basic definition can't be called communism.

Much like we don't use places like the Democratic people's Republic of Korea as an example of ehy democracy is bad, because its not actually a democracy, it doesn't meet the basic definition of democracy.

You can argue its an example of socialism, but it would be more accurate to describe it as authoritarianism because without democracy a state owned system can't really be called socialism.

[–] Shardikprime@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Venezuelan here, how has been your experience on lemmy so far while discussing your real life experience of what leftists advocate for? Mine has been less than stellar

[–] fidodo@lemm.ee -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes, as with all things it must be balanced. Also, I wish we could recognize that monopolies are not capitalism, it's just cronyism and there's no place for that. It's the antithesis of capitalism and it plagues communism too. It's just pure corruption.

[–] hopelessbyanxiety@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

i thought monopoly is just the natural development in a competition, which (the competition) is pretty relevant in any market economy. I mean, an alt history line could have every monopoly in the market being prevented by gov regulation. But that would require gov that's not payed in any way by the 1%, who benefit from inexistent competition, to serve its own interest. That's really far from today's reality, in most countries i guess.

[–] fidodo@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

It is a natural development which is why we have anti trust laws. We recognized over 100 years ago that monopolies are bad and that they need to be broken up to keep capitalism healthy, but decades of corporate lobbying and propaganda made that practice stop happening. You're right that we need to clean up corruption in the government to make that happen again.

[–] gowan@reddthat.com 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The wheat shortage in the 1980s had to do with a blight hitting the strains the USSR grew. The problem was not growing enough different strains of wheat that weren't susceptible to the blight not their method of distributing food.

[–] SCB@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Well it wasn't so much a problem to Russians because their centralized economic system allowed them to simply starve away those they didn't like

[–] Glitchington@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Okay but like, at least understand why the shelves were empy. Behind the Bastards had a great podcast on the matter. Bad science is bad science, no matter how you trade.

[–] protist@mander.xyz 1 points 1 year ago

What Lysenko did and the magnitude of it was enabled by and is inextricable from the Soviet systems of government and economy:

Lysenko's success at encouraging farmers to return to working their lands impressed Stalin, who also approved of Lysenko's peasant background, as Stalin claimed to stand with the proletariat. By the late 1920s, the USSR's leaders had given their support to Lysenko. This support was a consequence, in part, of policies put in place by the Communist Party to rapidly promote members of the proletariat into leadership positions in agriculture, science and industry. Party officials were looking for promising candidates with backgrounds similar to Lysenko's: born of a peasant family, without formal academic training or affiliations to the academic community. Due to close partnership between Stalin and Lysenko, Lysenko acquired an influence over genetics in the Soviet Union during the early and mid twentieth century. Lysenko eventually became the director of Genetics for the Academy of Sciences in 1940, which gave him even more control over genetics. He remained in the position for more than two decades, throughout the reigns of Stalin and Nikita Khruschchev, until he was relieved of his duties in 1965.

[–] sverit@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, the problems are just different. A mixed form would be ideal, where basic needs would be handled socially and the rest may compete in a capitalist way. The difficulty is where to draw the line exactly.

[–] DadVolante@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

Food.

Shelter.

Education.

Healthcare.

I miss anything?

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works -5 points 1 year ago

Crown corporations/co-ops/worker owned companies for essential needs, capitalism for all non essentials.

Tada!