Support (lemm.ee)

821 readers

8 users here now

lemm.ee Support

You can make a post here if you're looking for support with any issues!

For general discussion about lemm.ee, please post in !meta instead.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

sunaurus@lemm.ee

UniversalMonk ban evasion (slrpnk.net)

submitted 6 days ago by auk@slrpnk.net to c/support@lemm.ee

28 comments fedilink hide all child comments

UniversalMonk has been evading the a ban on him by posting from new accounts on !pleasantpolitics@slrpnk.net. That's ban evasion, which on most instances leads to an account-level ban, as far as I know. The relevant account is UniversalMonk@lemm.ee.

I'm not sure how to notify admins on lemm.ee, so I'm posting here. If ban evasion justifies an account ban on lemm.ee, then it's time. If there's a better place to send this note, let me know, and I'll do that instead.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] auk@slrpnk.net 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

And you can easily not “endure” me by blocking my name.

Part of the point of the violation here is that, if someone's already blocked your name, they now have to do it again for three new accounts, until you make more beyond those three.

I already think that trolling and saying that anyone who doesn't like it should just block you is unreasonable. Trolling and saying that anyone who doesn't like it needs to block every new account you make to keep trolling with when one gets banned is a whole different level.

[–] UniversalMonk@slrpnk.net -1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Part of the point of the violation here is that, if someone’s already blocked your name, they now have to do it again for three new accounts, until you make more beyond those three.

Which takes two seconds. I know because I've blocked several people. It's not that difficult and I think site-wide banning because of opinions you don't like is bad form. Avoiding that is the entire point of the fediverse.

But like I said, you and I have resolved our issues. We can move on.