this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2024
202 points (98.1% liked)

Programming

17416 readers
104 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
snowe@programming.dev
Ategon@programming.dev
MaungaHikoi@lemmy.nz
202
Is Python's tooling incredibly difficult, or am I just stupid? (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 1 week ago by zaphodb2002@sh.itjust.works to c/programming@programming.dev
115 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

So I'm no expert, but I have been a hobbyist C and Rust dev for a while now, and I've installed tons of programs from GitHub and whatnot that required manual compilation or other hoops to jump through, but I am constantly befuddled installing python apps. They seem to always need a very specific (often outdated) version of python, require a bunch of venv nonsense, googling gives tons of outdated info that no longer works, and generally seem incredibly not portable. As someone who doesn't work in python, it seems more obtuse than any other language's ecosystem. Why is it like this?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] moonpiedumplings@programming.dev 14 points 1 week ago (2 children)

How to improve Python packaging, or why fourteen tools are at least twelve too many

Still relevant.

[–] flying_sheep@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

No it's not. E.g. nobody who starts a new project uses setup.py anymore

[–] moonpiedumplings@programming.dev 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

OP seems to be trying to install older projects, rather than creating a new project.

[–] Kissaki@programming.dev 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Are you sure? I'm not very active in that ecosystem, but if that was prevalent in the past, surely there's still tutorials and stuff out there that people would follow and create such projects even today?

More than that, it seems to me that the official python docs for packaging [still] talks about setup.py. Why would people not use that?

[–] flying_sheep@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Sure, there was some hyperbole. Some people need some specific setuptools plugin or something. Almost nobody.

[–] snowe@programming.dev 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

when the official docs are telling you to use it, then it's used. You can have no expectation of people to think the tooling isn't shit when it's literally the official recommendation.

[–] flying_sheep@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

It doesn't. read the first words behind the link you posted:

Page Status: Outdated

Here is the actual one: https://packaging.python.org/en/latest/tutorials/packaging-projects/