this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2024
502 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

59377 readers
3239 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] frezik@midwest.social 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's not just performance, though. It's also trust. If performance per watt was all that mattered, AMD would have cornered the server market years ago. Intel held on because they were considered rock solid stable--very important in a server. That trust was completely broken by the recent instability issues.

[–] schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I didn't think the consumer-level chip immolation carried over to their xeons?

If it did, holy crap, they're mega-ultra-turbo-plaid levels of screwed.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 1 points 1 week ago

Not quite that, but more that the entire thing brings into question Intel's competence.