this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2024
544 points (95.5% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35806 readers
1557 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 37 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It's simple, and history has borne this out many many times.

In a bad economy, no one cares about your politics if you're the candidate of change. There's a reason why Harris spent two months repeating memes instead of defending Biden's policies, because it's impossible to defend the fact that you had four years to rule and there are more people working 2-3 jobs just to survive.

They knew they needed to appeal to workers. Instead, they spent most of the campaign repeating this meaningless platitude about joy to people who are being worked to death.

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

In a bad economy, no one cares about your politics

That's no excuse for electing someone whose stated policies and politics will fuck the economy even further and faster.

[–] jdnewmil@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 week ago

Sure it is, if you don't understand economics, which few Merkins do. The evidence is right in front of us.

[–] ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Also, there were plenty of people who were never going to vote for a woman, no matter what.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

I'm sure that's true too, but that's not the reason she lost, and Democrats will continue to stack losses if that's the narrative that they go with.

Democrats haven't been ceding male voters to Republicans for 16 years because they hate women. It's because, in the liberal and activist communities, it's become customary and accepted to treat men like shit.

[–] kava@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

It’s because, in the liberal and activist communities, it’s become customary and accepted to treat men like shit.

this is just as dumb as the opposite "they didn't vote for Kamala because she's a woman"

people don't like Kamala because she's an extension of Joe Biden and Biden has been a failure. that's why she lost. she offered status quo when people want change. the DNC is incapable of changing quick enough to avoid fascism

[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Democrats will continue to stack losses if that's the narrative that they go with

$20 says that or race is the narrative they go with.

[–] djsoren19@yiffit.net 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'd never take that bet, they already started today You can find them in threads across the fediverse.

[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Oh yeah, it's a sucker's bet, I was just hoping to find a sucker who would take it

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

I wouldn't be surprised.

[–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 week ago

Plenty of people will also never vote for a black man, but that worked spectacularly for the Democrats the first time.

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Don’t forget immigrants who hate immigrants.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Then maybe don't force a woman onto the ballot in "the most important election of our lifetime". I'm all for progress, but you don't win elections by forcing ideals upon people who won't have them, and if this was truly the most important election of our lifetime, then the Democrats should have fielded their most appealing candidate.

[–] the_post_of_tom_joad@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Yeah if the DNC really gave as much credence to the vote power of racism and misogyny as they do when complaining about election losses, then why would they deliberately step on that landmine by selecting kamala only 8 years after HRC? It's not like we think idealistic dreamers run the DNC right? That's silly.

Why did Dems lose the Senate? Keep the house? Cuz its more than just Harris here.... What we're seeing is voter repudiation of the last 4 years.

[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 week ago

If that's why Kamala lost, then explain why Tammy Baldwin is winning Wisconsin and Elissa Slotkin is winning in Michigan.