this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2024
204 points (88.9% liked)

Science Memes

10897 readers
4241 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ryan213@lemmy.ca 78 points 1 day ago (4 children)
[–] Scipitie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 41 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Hypothesis: the message seems to imply that the cliche nature lover needs to trample and destroy said nature to be close to it.

This seems the most likely explanation to me.

And I find it neither funny nor insightful.

Edit: I can't manage to copy paste usernames on mobile but please check out the refinement by the comment to this post. Highly valuable edition. Tldr of it: not "nature lovers" in general but social media invasive nature lovers.

[–] Wrufieotnak@feddit.org 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's not so much nature lovers but social media "content creators" who are criticized here.

There was a case I read of a man caring for a beautiful patch of flowers, but then it got famous on social media and those assholes went there in buses, took pictures lying in there and destroyed it. Heartbreaking to read about that one. Sadly I can't find that specific case anymore, but there are enough articles about the problem, like this one.

[–] Scipitie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 day ago

Oh. That would explain the hashtags. I'll edit my comment to point out yours!

Thanks!

[–] Jax@sh.itjust.works 56 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Few people understand why I glare them after obliterating a perfectly nice patch of flowers.

[–] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 35 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I thought the joke was about the common mutation where your second toe is longer than your big toe.

Your explanation makes way more sense.

[–] duckythescientist@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I thought it was a foot fetish thing

[–] parpol@programming.dev 13 points 1 day ago

I thought city folk didn't like that feeling of grass tickling your feet.

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You mean it's not the grass poking between your toes?

[–] KazuyaDarklight@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Grass poking was what I thought too.

[–] Jax@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I mean, I like the feeling of grass between my toes.

[–] tdawg@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This really depends on the type of grass and time of year

[–] Jax@sh.itjust.works 1 points 18 hours ago

I think we can assume that this is spring/early summer, but yeah - you aren't wrong. I can't see myself enjoying grass between my toes if I have to shove my bare feet through a meter of snow.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

are people traipsing through planted lilies or what?

[–] Jax@sh.itjust.works 3 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Very common, at least here in California, for there to be nice blooms of flowers that people decide to obliterate so they can take pictures for social media. By the time the 80th troglodyte traipses through the flowers, they've ruined it for everyone else that might enjoy them - and the flowers are fucked.

I can almost guarantee that this is the point of the comic. The only other interpretation I've seen that I can accept is that it's actually about the grass between your toes, which some people dislike.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

why would they need to trample them to take photos?

[–] Jax@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 hours ago

Because they aren't interested in the flowers, they're interested in how they look with the flowers all around them. It's a selfish act for vain individuals.

[–] dingus@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I weirdly see a lot of these "yes...but..." Comics everywhere and I don't get like 90% of them tbh.

[–] ryan213@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 day ago

This is the first one I've seen so I guess I'm at 0%. 😭