this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2024
402 points (99.3% liked)

Linux

5230 readers
191 users here now

A community for everything relating to the linux operating system

Also check out !linux_memes@programming.dev

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kryptonidas@lemmings.world 22 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Good stuff good stuff. Have been a Mac user for years now. But the Framework laptops sure are tempting. Then it will be Linux all the way. More free and more sustainable.

[–] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Hopefully Apple will be forced to become repairable again like during pre-2015.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 week ago

Don't hold your breath

[–] kryptonidas@lemmings.world 2 points 1 week ago

Oh yeah, with my 2008 MBP I have had replaced multiple parts and the screen. To try that now is a fools errand.

[–] kameecoding@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

I have had gone Mac because framework wasn't selling in my country, but got an email about two weeks back that they started selling here too, so once my macbook dies or becomes too slow I will be buying a framework

[–] Mad_Punda@feddit.org 3 points 1 week ago

Same.
I think I would need comparable energy efficiency as well though. For portable machines it’s hard to go for an x86_64 one when I can get so much more battery life out of an arm one.
Getting official support for a distribution should help with a good out of the box battery life at least. But I think they’d need arm or riscv before it really becomes comparable?