this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2024
158 points (83.8% liked)

Technology

59116 readers
3845 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
158
Discussion: People who use Kagi search don't understand how does Kagi work. (github.com)
submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by Dot@feddit.org to c/technology@lemmy.world
75 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I want to start by inviting everyone who are looking into this post to check the git commit linked before reading and after that read their current page, it will make more sense.

I think most people don't understand the fact that Kagi is meta-search engine which literally collect the results of other search engines and display it and add very small amount of results from their index(tecilis).

They are starting to act shady this year(check the attached git commit to see their changes to their documentation page).

People basically pay them to search Yandex and Brave for them.

Before anyone say but privacy, they are closed source and there is a better open source meta search engines which actually respect your privacy and need your donations more than Kagi shareholders.

Open source alternative:

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Telorand@reddthat.com -4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Because downvotes are lazy commentary. I'd rather judge for myself what constitutes a bad take and use words to encourage or debate. I don't need a bunch of angry keyboard warriors poisoning the discourse with voluntary polling.

Plus, seeing a bunch of negative numbers doesn't make anyone feel good. I would rather Lemmy be a better place than Reddit.

[–] tofubl@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I like this perspective of yours, and while I don't think I'll join you on your instance (I take it this was an open invitation, yes?), I'll look into ways to hide votes on my client.

Although I do wonder, would you prefer everyone to return to long strings of "+1" and "agreed" posts?

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Not in particular, but at least I could ostensibly set up a filter (or automod) that hid or removed low-quality comments like that. Removing downvotes is kinda the same effect.

I'm not saying voting should go away entirely. This instance still has upvotes, after all, but Lemmy will just turn into the cynical, pessimistic, self-fallating shithole that Reddit has become if we don't do anything differently as a community.

(And yes, it was just an open invitation—a reminder, if you will, that The Fediverse is a cool place where you have choices regarding how you experience it.)