this post was submitted on 02 Nov 2024
448 points (94.8% liked)

Comic Strips

12411 readers
3472 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world 30 points 3 days ago (3 children)

I would like to know what setup can transfer 8K wirelessly without issues.

[–] Metz@lemmy.world 34 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Shouldn't any WiFi from the last decade be sufficient? 8k with H.265 only needs a good 100mbps. Even the 15 year old 802.11n should be able to do that. Anything more modern would not even break a sweat.

[–] rbos@lemmy.ca 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Encoding h.265 on a small enough camera might be a problem? But if they have money ...

[–] Riven@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Doesn't have to be a small cheap camera. If they're willing to go this far with an 8k TV in the bathroom i don't see why's the cam couldn't be a pricey good one.

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Nothing was said about framerate. Could be 1 FPS...

[–] Riven@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 days ago

Lul fair enough. I personally would splurge for 60 frames at least if I'm going that far but that's just me.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 9 points 3 days ago

He just said it's a 8k monitor, not the camera.

[–] Kbobabob@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It says ultra -hd which is 4K and that can be transmitted wirelessly.

[–] Psythik@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

Which is why it's such a strange request. Why splurge on an 8K TV if you're only going to watch 4K video on it?