this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2024
769 points (98.7% liked)

People Twitter

5168 readers
983 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
SendMeYourTaTas@sh.itjust.works
pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
769
"Necessary" (lemmy.ml)
submitted 6 days ago by usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml to c/whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works
100 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

https://www.threads.net/@kamalahq/post/DBwSh-pMOIh

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Godort@lemm.ee 146 points 6 days ago (5 children)

necessary for what?

necessary for what, motherfucker?

[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 53 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Your comment has the same energy as "states' rights to do what?", and I'm here for it.

[–] flicker@lemmy.world 19 points 6 days ago (1 children)

If I wasn't at work I'd edit the goose meme to match.

[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 10 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)
[–] flicker@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

You get me.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 37 points 6 days ago

For a complete fascist takeover.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 days ago

Protectionism. Musk stands to gain a ton if there's less competition from imported EVs, and that's true for a lot of other products that American companies make. If you can just throw a few million at a presidential campaign and essentially guarantee your competitors will have a 10-60% disadvantage, those few millions can turn into billions in profit.

On paper, the goal seems to be to spur companies to return to the US, but I think the net impact will be higher prices for Americans and reduced trade w/ other countries due to retaliatory tariffs.