this post was submitted on 29 Oct 2024
212 points (95.3% liked)

Technology

59116 readers
3713 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] echodot@feddit.uk 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Well that's debatable but really the point is it never did a re-entry so we really don't know how reusable it would have been.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 0 points 6 days ago (1 children)

If it didn't do a reentry, how did it get down from that altitude?

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

By landing?

Reentry doesn't mean flying downwards it means actually coming in at a high enough speed to generate heating. Otherwise it's just falling.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 2 points 6 days ago

I'm pretty sure any reentry from orbit is going to involve high enough speeds to generate heating.