this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2024
2029 points (99.5% liked)

People Twitter

5396 readers
642 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
SendMeYourTaTas@sh.itjust.works
pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
2029
Stuck in the middle with you (lemmy.world)
submitted 2 months ago by The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world to c/whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works
299 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] pyre@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago (3 children)

TL;DR? Why not just go watch another five second video of a kitten with its head in a toilet roll, or a 140 character description of a meal your friend just stuffed in their mouth. "nom nom". This blog post is not for you.

wow, this some next level obnoxious boomer shit.

[–] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Is it incorrect?

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

there is no statement there so I don't know what you mean by "incorrect". all i see is someone who doesn't know how people use tldr.

[–] taladar@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Or someone who knows very well people use tldr to skip reading the post and you are annoyed that he caught you being that lazy.

[–] pyre@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

valuing my time isn't lazy. if you can't summarize your post you're probably shit at writing and the article is not worth the time in the first place.

[–] lightsblinken@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

not trying to be combative, but this grumpy response over a 5min read does illustrate something and i hope its trolling tbh. the tldr summary that is triggering here is kinda a key point of the article - people looking for a quick interaction and then moving on.

[–] pyre@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago

this is what i mean by shit at writing.

this fails to be the point of the article unless the article is suggesting people are moving on to quick interactions because they are deliberately being moved away from longer articles by the authors that suggest these articles aren't worth their time... is the point of the article that longer content is belligerent and condescending?

I don't think it's actually getting any point across. it's just a boomer who thinks no one has anything better to do.

[–] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Was it too long for you and you didn't read it?

In that case ....This blog post is not for you.

That's what the question mark does. It marks a question.

RTFA? RTFA!

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

I didn't read it because the tldr is retarded.

[–] AVincentInSpace@pawb.social 1 points 2 months ago

In the sense that I don't believe the people described exist in any significant quantity, yes.

[–] DerHaseWillSchmako@feddit.org 1 points 2 months ago

If you are offended by this, then you obviously didn't read the article.

[–] LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 2 months ago

The definition of cringe, gramps needs 70ccs of sensory content, stat