Asklemmy

43770 readers

1503 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

Did the recent Linux drama change your views on how you perceived Open Source projects? (lemmy.ml)

submitted 1 week ago by Artemis_Mystique@lemmy.ml to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

121 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I for one am going through quite a culture shock. I always assumed the nature of FOSS software made it immune to be confined within the policies of nations; I guess if one day the government of USA starts to think that its a security concers for china to use and contribute to core opensource software created by its citizens or based in their boundaries, they might strongarm FOSS communities and projects to make their software exclude them in someway or worse declare GPL software a threat to national security.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] troed@fedia.io -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm in Sweden. The idea that the US is somehow more of a danger to us than Russia is laughable.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Russia invading is a statistical risk. The USA (as the leading avatar of capital) exploiting, degrading, and destroying the commons we need to survive is an unavoidable certainty. Russia and Sweden are also doing those things, but on a significantly lesser scale.

[–] troed@fedia.io 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Maybe you should read the IPCC reports?

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

That's a lot to cover... I've learned so far that Russia is responsible for 4% of the world's CO_2 emissions, and that emissions in Russia and Ukraine have decreased fastest of all countries since 1990. That the USA is responsible for 28% of all emissions that have accumulated since the Industrial revolution, and that Russia has emitted 11%. Is there something specific you would like me to learn about?

In large part, it's simply a matter of scale and wealth concentration. If Canada was as large and wealthy as the USA, we'd probably all be cooked by now.

[–] troed@fedia.io 2 points 1 week ago

Climate change is not a risk to human survival. Please study the WG2 parts for the possible risks we're facing depending on when and how much action we take.

You're correct in that large parts of Russia don't have indoor toilets and proper sanitation. Not sure that's a positive.