this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2024
764 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

59116 readers
3845 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 100 points 1 week ago (3 children)

"Are you 15 or more years old? Y/N"

There, that fixed the problem.

[–] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 26 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (6 children)

IIRC Norway has an actual Nat ID system, so assuming ðey develop a workable API for it ðis could actually be implemented quite easily.

Preventing kids stealing ðeir parents' IDs to open accounts anyway will be ð actual challenge.

[–] CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social 37 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Is there a reason that you use some character (I'm afraid I don't know the name of it) wherever you would otherwise use "th"? I can't guess if it's some kind of technical issue with federated text, something from a different language you're incorporating, or one of those "I think we should add x symbol to the language so I'll use it to draw attention to the effort" deals, like with the people that use the combined !? symbols whenever both are relevant at once.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 62 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It's a thorn, a letter making a th sound. Still in use in Icelandic, I think. In English, it's archaic at best.

Fun fact, when it fell out of use, the letter Y was used to replace it for a while. So when you see something saying "ye olde", verbally it's still "the old".

[–] RootBeerGuy@discuss.tchncs.de 16 points 1 week ago

I actually always wondered about the y in old texts. Thanks!

[–] kryptonite@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's eth, actually, not thorn.

I had thought that eth was used in Old English for the voiced "th" and thorn for the unvoiced "th", but Wikipedia says they were used interchangeably for both sounds.

You're right otherwise. Thorn was not available on printing presses because they were being made in countries that didn't use the letter, which is why the letter Y was used instead until "th" became more common.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thorn_(letter)

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eth

[–] pdqcp@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 week ago

That's a shame, I would have loved to keep using those thorns and eths. Quite weird to think that they didn't even want to ask for a few customs pieces for those letters.

[–] elliot_crane@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I’m probably doing exactly what they want here (e.g. having a conversation about it), but that letter is called “Eth” and was the Old English way of spelling the “th” sound: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eth

A number of linguistic buffs want to bring it back to the modern English alphabet.

[–] Faresh@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago

~~I don't think ð was pronounced exactly the same way as th~~Seems like I was thinking of other languages where they were/are pronounced differently.

[–] greybeard@lemmy.one 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

A møøse once bit my sister.

[–] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 week ago

This commenter has been sacked.

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

What ð heck are are you talking about, it looks normal. To me. Maybe ðeres someðing wrong wið your computer.

[–] mannycalavera@feddit.uk 0 points 1 week ago

Is there a reason that you use some character (I'm afraid I don't know the name of it) wherever you would otherwise use "th"?

Passive aggressive typing.

[–] Anivia@feddit.org 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

So then the kids will just use a VPN

Yup, ProtonVPN is free, and there are covert ways to purchase other VPNs (i.e. cash in an envelope).

All this would do is make it much harder for their parents to figure out what their kids are doing. If they can access it w/o a VPN, a regular internet logger can help inform parents of their traffic.

[–] PlexSheep@infosec.pub 1 points 1 week ago

Kids often have no money, especially not money they can spend online, no?

[–] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

so assuming they develop

Psst… ðey

[–] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee -2 points 1 week ago
[–] cy_narrator@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Whats that O with an aeroplane?

[–] CommanderCloon@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

It's the original English letter for th which was more or less deleted from the alphabet when imported printing press types lacked said letter.

Before it got universally replaced by th some printers used y like in "ye olde" which is really pronounced "the old"

[–] meliaesc@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago
[–] 0x0@programming.dev -1 points 1 week ago

could actually be implemented quite easily.

Without any risk for sure....

[–] moitoi@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

No need of this. Make a mandatory physical check of the ID that can't be subcontracted. People want an account? They need to go to an office and open it there like it was the case in the past for a bank account.

[–] Oaksey@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

True but would you prefer weak enforcement or strong enforcement?
Strong enforcement would likely involve the government having better records of your browsing habits.

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

My government already knows all of my kinks, I include a list of all the porn I watched each year with my tax return. They don't ask for that, but I provide it anyway.

Hey, you never know, maybe you'll get a response with some recommendations. You miss 100% of the shots you don't take, after all.

I prefer weak enforcement every time. It's effective for kids who would follow the law anyway, and it doesn't push the kids to use more covert means if they wouldn't follow the law anyway. The latter group is therefore much easier to monitor using standard tools, and good parents with deviant children can use that effectively to help solve their problems before they become more serious.

[–] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If they admit they're below the age of 15 they should be banned until they reach the mature age.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

That'll get them. No one under 15 has any idea what a VPN is.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

How hard up are you for Facebook? Like, there's a technical solution, sure. But a big part of social media's addictive quality is ease of access.

Making access annoying absolutely will curb teen use.

[–] gwen@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

downloading and using a vpn is super easy now though?????

[–] CommanderCloon@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Sure, but what they're saying is that even a little bit of friction will make some people give up, and that kills the virality of things like social media

[–] EngineerGaming@feddit.nl 1 points 1 week ago

IDK... Where I live, a lot of things are blocked. And while there was a decline after the bans, the banned social media are NOWHERE close to being "dead" or "not viral".