this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2024

422 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

59428 readers

3493 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

422

AI-powered weapons scanners used in NYC subway found zero guns in one month test (apnews.com)

submitted 3 weeks ago by AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today to c/technology@lemmy.world

57 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] metaStatic@kbin.earth 121 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

but falsely alerted more than 100 times

oh, it's working

[–] Brunbrun6766@lemmy.world 83 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

AI powered Melanin detector

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 12 points 3 weeks ago

Trust me bro it aint raycist... Check these stats 🤡

[–] Arbiter@lemmy.world 23 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Gotta get that probable cause to search for weed.

[–] fuckingkangaroos@lemm.ee 10 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Recreational weed has been legal in NY for years

[–] nokturne213@sopuli.xyz 10 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Not if there is a federal agent. It is legal here in NM but the feds are constantly seizing pot because it is not legal at a federal level.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It's gonna be fun when it's legal in all 50 states at the state level, but still illegal federally.

Wait, did I say fun? I meant bullshit. It's going to be bullshit.

[+] helenslunch@feddit.nl -1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

[deleted]

[–] nokturne213@sopuli.xyz 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

https://news.yahoo.com/news/kamala-harris-said-she-long-200919997.html

“I just think we have come to a point where we have to understand that we need to legalize it and stop criminalizing this behavior,” she said. “Actually, this is not a new position for me. I have felt for a long time we need to legalize it, so that’s where I am on that.”

As San Francisco district attorney from 2004 to 2011, Harris oversaw over 1,900 convictions for cannabis violations, the San Jose Mercury News reported in 2019. Still, only a small number of those people ended up in prison.

https://www.cbsnews.com/sanfrancisco/news/analysis-tulsi-gabbard-kamala-harris/

Harris "put over fifteen hundred people in jail for marijuana violations"

As attorney general, Kamala Harris would not have personally prosecuted drug cases. Local district attorneys would generally prosecute such cases so to say Harris "put ... people in jail" as state attorney general is not accurate.

[+] helenslunch@feddit.nl -2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

[deleted]

[–] xyz1195@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Found the trump supporter guys.

Once again trying to find anything to discredit the dems.

[+] helenslunch@feddit.nl 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

[deleted]

[–] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de -1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

When it’s a first past the pole and electoral college game to get elected, discouraging votes for Harris necessarily helps Trump.

Same as encouraging 3rd party voting in a system where they are mathematically prevented from winning.

You either don’t understand the system we have, or you’re a disingenuous troll for Trump.

[–] Bertuccio@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Harris chose to do something immoral because "it was the law", or it benefited her, or whatever - and you can expect her to continue doing that.

You still have to vote for her, but you also have to be realistic about who you're actually voting for.

Republicans are the party who holds their candidates up without criticism - and Dems put up Kamala now exactly because Democrats were criticizing Biden - and even though she's one of the worst candidates they've put up in years, she's still far more electable than Biden.

So yes. You need to both vote for and criticize Harris. It's the least immoral choice.

[–] fuckingkangaroos@lemm.ee 1 points 3 weeks ago

I don't think federal agents are using these scanners to find people carrying weed

[–] BossDj@lemm.ee 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

That is up to the state's attorney general whether to go after drug offense or not

[–] nokturne213@sopuli.xyz 1 points 3 weeks ago

I guess tell that to the federal agents seizing legal cannabis.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Since when does law plays a role in harassment?

[–] Arbiter@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

Sorry, just replace weed with crack.