this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2023
-59 points (21.4% liked)
Asklemmy
43907 readers
1016 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
@Veritas your link does not quite say what you think it says/were told it says. Here's what it says:
2.8 percent of people in the study had mild myocardial effects (that's your one in 35)
most of them were women
the effects were shortlived, "mild and transient"
none of them even had any ECG changes
none of them had any adverse cardiac event
Here's a link to the actual published paper which is easier to read in browsers and carries more weight.
This is freely available information and I wish more media did cover it in a responsible manner, because this data supports that the vaccine is quite safe - we see the same thing in the larger cohort studies.
Unfortunately what we have in many western countries is a "dumbed down" populace that consumes childish media stories with very little information in them.