this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2024
587 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

59135 readers
3141 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 72 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Be that as it may, this is very much part of the intent of the sanctions. Creating popular dissent and dissatisfaction within Russia due to Putin’s insistence on carrying out a war of aggression is very much by design. This is the Second Cold War. We’re in it.

[–] nialv7@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Sure... Their anger will be directed at Putin, not at who actually imposed those sanctions.

I am worried that these sanctions will make them band together and support Putin even more.

[–] Laser@feddit.org 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Sure... Their anger will be directed at Putin, not at who actually imposed those sanctions.

I am worried that these sanctions will make them band together and support Putin even more.

And then what? They'll go to war even harder? And if Putin is such a good leader, why doesn't he just have Russia produce alternatives to the goods and services under sanctions?

The old status quo without sanctions got the world into the current situation. Why would keeping it the same fix it?

One could also make the opposite case for your logic: I am worried that without sanctions, people will see Putin as a strong leader, and as such hand together and support him even more.

[–] Bartsbigbugbag@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Sanctions have not succeeded in lessening support or creating regime change. They are a siege warfare tactic, and a way of inflicting suffering upon the masses of people. There’s plenty of books on the topic, I’d recommend Sanctions as War, edited by Stuart Davis and Immanuel Ness.

[–] nialv7@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Well, I never argued for not sanctioning them. I just think it's kind of fucked either way - if sanctions work, they start hating sanction imposers and band behind the dictator; if sanctions don't work, then obviously they are going to praise the dictator for his good work. It's lose-lose.

And I don't know if you have noticed or not, unfortunately, the sanctions aren't working that well... Maybe the answer is more sanctions? idk

[–] Laser@feddit.org 1 points 1 week ago

And I don't know if you noticed or not, unfortunately, the sanctions aren't working that well... Maybe the answer is more sanctions? idk

I'm in favor of more of them, but I don't think the current ones aren't working. It was clear from the beginning that they'd be escalating so that Russia has a way out. They're not using it so sanctions get worse.

[–] meneervana@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago

Could go both ways, but really the change has to come from within, they will have to change this in the end

[–] levzzz@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Really sucks though that 90% of war supporters are brainwashed/indoctrinated anyway