this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2024
169 points (95.7% liked)
Technology
59428 readers
3493 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I've been saying this for 30+ years. Piracy is by large NOT a group of people looking to avoid paying for a product.
Piracy is often the result of your product being either unavailable to purchase at a reasonable price, or difficult to comply with the law.
I saw an NFL schedule for my local team at a bar recently. Every week it's a different time, different network, some aren't even airing over OTA, it's on Amazon Prime......for 1 game. Nobody is going to pay $120 for a year for amazon prime, to watch 1 game for 3 hours.
That shit is what led to piracy.
Metalica loved to bitch and complain, about Napster giving away their songs. It's not THEIR fault per se, so I do see them as also the victims, but the whole industry was fucked back then.
You'd pay $20 for a CD of some band, and find out 16 songs, and you like 3 of them. $20 in 1999 would be like $35-$45 today.
Then you'd find out Napster exists, and you can download JUST those 3 songs. You were willing to pay a reasonable price for those 3 songs, but the record labels wouldn't take your money. Not unless you wanted to buy either the full album, or a singles disc which only had their radio releases that THEY picked.
Then after napster died, Apple says "hey, what if we charged $0.99 for 1 song, as picked by the user? A full album in this way would still be close to $20, but we don't have a physical good to ship and pay labor on."
And THATS when digital music really took off. Because they made a buttload that year. Record labels FINALLY realized people will pay if you offer a product, easily available at a reasonable price. Suddenly profits in the music industry which had been declining for a decade, were booming. Piracy was on the decline.
And yet the video industry never learned this lesson. Netflix came in, boom, all this money to be made from subscribers. It was cheap, it was all in one place, and it was easy.
Then over 10 years every channel has a video service.
And prices are increasing.
And account sharing is being cracked down on.
So it's no longer easy, it's no longer cheap. It's no longer....oh hey, piracy is on the rise.
Plus that whole thing where record companies got caught price-fixing CDs. And the other thing where they got caught installing rootkits from CDs
I forgot about that! Sony specifically did it.
Technically BMG, who Sony was invested in (and subsequently bought).
Sony wasn't actually directly involved, as BMG ran independently, or so they say. It's unclear whether Sony knew or not.
Everything you say here makes a ton of sense.
I can only imagine some dumbfuck executive seeing this and going "Oh my god, we need to be charging by the episode! Sales will BOOM!"
Careful what you wish for.
Bought Brooklyn 99 on DVD recently since Netflix thought it was great to only put the first 4 seasons up. My biggest regret is that I didn't look more to find a brick and mortar store to buy from. Best buy doesn't even carry DVDs anymore.
Apple already supports buying individual episodes on the iTunes Store.
Not surprised. Apple is amongst the shystiest of shysters.
I mean....I know you prefaced this by saying they're a dumbfuck, but that decision would really be missing the forest through the trees.
Yeah, that's pretty much my point.