this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2024
219 points (97.0% liked)

Games

32951 readers
1405 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lockhart@lemmy.ml 71 points 2 months ago (2 children)

and executives expressed concerns that a sequel would cannibalize long-term sales of the first game

This is legit the most ridiculous take I've ever seen

[–] Gerudo@lemm.ee 40 points 2 months ago

Right? Like there are 48 Assasins Creed games, sequels are their bread and butter.

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 12 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Don't sequels actually cause new audiences to show up, who then go back and play the first game?

[–] dditty@lemm.ee 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Exactly this; for a video game developer to claim otherwise is incomprehensible, and likely is just doublespeak to mask something

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 3 points 2 months ago

Or they're morons who are only familiar with the Games As Service model and completely forgot that's not the only type of game they sell.