This is literally already happening and has been since at least Bush and Obama? Does people think the border camps are operated and manned through pinky promises and good-faith dialogue? ICE uses boxes of chocolates and impassioned pleas? I guess this is support of it continuing?

[–] anarcho_blinkenist@hexbear.net 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

wait is this just polling US Christians? Did they go to a bunch of churches what is this breakdown lol. Its "methodology" section just names a Stanford-linked research company but doesn't actually say anything about their criteria here. The number is lower for "unaffiliated" but there's no breakdown of how many of each of these groups proportionally were asked what.

[–] anarcho_blinkenist@hexbear.net 6 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

it is lmao, this whole report is constantly relating things to "christian nationalism" and its affects on politics. what trash. And there's no class (or even income) or living environment (urban, rural, suburban, gated fcking community) breakdown or anything, and definitely includes no homeless and lumpen areas, is so fixated on religion, and the 18-29 age group is vanishingly small compared to olders

and they totally avoid breaking down the generational percentages on a few questions including this one. This whole report is garbage, I read the actual report and it doesn't clarify itself for shit, its selection process just blindly assures that it is 'representative'(enough to say "percentage of americans") when they're just emailing people from USPS databases with an additional 315 opt-in which is its own selection type (5000 people no less, to extrapolate to the whole country in all its differing segments for which their breakdown is barely existent except for Christianity types and intersections).

And it is all so obtuse in its focus and bent on this "christian nationalism," and questions are either vague as to be pointless or weirdly aggressively leading to try to bend it toward that frame and then burying the contextual construction of the series of questions built around it, and their component subquestions, in different places in the text or in separate graphs (with some of the worst graphs I've ever seen, why did they do it this way?). And what little cohesion there was in the report this article removes by separating one part, which is broken down into meaningful demographics and extrapolated even less than the other sections even in the report itself, along these same bizarre obtuse lines. I really don't trust this 5000 person religious-focused obtuse garbage to be able to say as it does "percent of americans." This is fucking awful.

EDIT:

About PRRI
PRRI is a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization dedicated to research at the intersection of religion, values, and public life.
Our mission is to help journalists, opinion leaders, scholars, clergy, and the general public better understand debates on public policy issues and the role of religion and values in American public life by conducting high quality public opinion surveys and qualitative research.
PRRI is a member of the American Association for Public Opinion Research (AAPOR), the Ameri- can Political Science Association (APSA), and the American Academy of Religion (AAR), and follows the highest research standards of independence and academic excellence. History
Since PRRI’s founding in 2009, our research has become a standard source of trusted information among journalists, scholars, policy makers, clergy, and the general public. PRRI research has been cited in thousands of media stories and academic publications and plays a leading role in deepening public understanding of the changing religious landscape and its role in shaping American politics.

PIGPOOPBALLS