World News

32513 readers

849 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

Rumblestiltskin@lemmy.ml

AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml

jackmarxist@lemmy.ml

zephyreks@lemmy.ml

OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml

UK to lend Ukraine an additional £2.26bn for weapons to fight Russia (www.theguardian.com)

submitted 2 months ago by Turbonics@lemmy.sdf.org to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml

23 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Britain is to lend Ukraine an additional £2.26bn and allow Kyiv to spend the money on weapons to fight off the Russian invasion as part of a wider $50bn (£38.5bn) loan programme expected to be confirmed by G7 members later this week.

The loans will be repaid using interest generated by the $300bn of frozen Russian assets held in the west, with the extra funds promised as the US heads towards a presidential election where support for Ukraine is a divisive issue.

Rachel Reeves said: “The profits being made on those assets aren’t being kept for Russia to use in the future. They’re now being used to fund Ukraine.” The chancellor made the announcement alongside the defence secretary, John Healey.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] FuckyWucky@hexbear.net 9 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

The profits being made on those assets aren’t being kept for Russia to use in the future. They’re now being used to fund Ukraine

Rachel, Where do "profits" on these assets come from? These aren't corporate bonds but Government bonds. The Governments (US, UK and others) are paying the defence contractors using public money.

If there were no Russian foreign reserves being stolen, would the west not have sent weapons to Ukraine? Of course not! The weapons manufacturers have to make profits, it would come out of a different Government account.

They are making excuses to make it look like the public isn't paying for it.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 1 points 2 months ago

I don't think anyone is saying it isn't public money. More than Ukrain isn't on the hook to repay the loan after the war like the UK was to the US after WW2.