this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2024
1215 points (97.3% liked)

Microblog Memes

5706 readers
3730 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] rockerface@lemm.ee 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

My point was more that people have a fundamental right to live, but sure

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world -2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

What does that even mean? Of course you have a fundamental right to keep your life. That doesn't mean you have the right to receive food and shelter without effort, when those things require effort to produce. Yet we do sometimes provide those things to people who don't labor. They're not very nice, and they don't provide a life of abundance, but they are available to many people who wouldn't have had those options at earlier points in history. It is a great advancement in our society that we can provide for the basic needs of people who aren't capable of providing for themselves, either in whole, or in part. But if you're capable of working, and providing for yourself, then you should meet that challenge with urgency, especially since the taxes from your labors contribute to the assistance for the incapable that I mentioned above. We may eventually reach a point where nobody needs to labor, but not in our lifetime.

[–] rockerface@lemm.ee 1 points 2 weeks ago

We could already have been at that point if 99% of the actual value of our labor wasn't stolen by the rich. But sure, I guess we can't reach it with this attitude