this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2023
163 points (95.0% liked)

Technology

59402 readers
3857 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Plan to commercialize supercapacitors in the next few years

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 35 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

A solution that is inexpensive, scales, is not inconvenient, and fits household demands? What's the catch?

I hope it's as good as it sounds and becomes a thing.

[–] Rakust@kbin.social 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

One of the big catches is how Greenhouse gas intensive concrete production is

[–] Spedwell@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I think the idea here is to bake it into construction that would happen anyway. If you just need energy storage, keep using batteries. But if you're pouring a foundation already, why not also turn that foundation into a battery?

[–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

concrete seems to be used here for its structural properties, just like we do it today. Their solution doesn't seem to require it:

If more powerful capacitors are required, they can be made with a larger concentration of carbon black, at the expense of some structural strength. This could be useful for applications where the concrete is not playing a structural role or where the full strength potential of concrete is not required. For applications such as a foundation, or structural elements of the base of a wind turbine, the “sweet spot” is around 10 percent carbon black in the mix, the team says.

[–] zout@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

And how greenhouse gas intensive is carbon black production?

[–] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 7 points 1 year ago

If you’re releasing CO2 you’re losing carbon.

If you make it with electricity it’s effectively a carbon sink.

[–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If it's just a byproduct of other industries, like existing coal power plants, it might be seen as carbon neutral. And lithium batteries also use it.

[–] zout@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Carbon black is produced bij burning a hydrocarbon with a limited amount of air. It's not a byproduct, but uses organic materials. This can be of renewable sources like vegetable oil, but it is made a lot from the heavy fractions in fossil oil.

[–] iltoroargento@lemmy.sdf.org 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I mean, there's a reason why we've taken so long with even electric cars lol I hope this becomes a reality, but moneyed interests will fight tooth and nail.

Edit: Also, they sold the idea of electric cars to us so we wouldn't question a lack of infrastructure investment in railways which we so desperately need.

[–] kautau@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Yeah they’ll scoop up the technology patents and then slowly utilize it if and when it works in their favor to maximize their profits

[–] bernieecclestoned@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago (5 children)

The team worked out that a 45 cubic meter material block of nanocarbon-black-doped concrete would have enough capacity to store about 10kWh

10kWh is enough to run a house for a day, how much concrete would be in a house with concrete walls?

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

I mean, its not clear you want to build a house out of concrete walls that aren't entirely, well, concrete. Even so, its a neat idea, but coming out of the MIT press mill, I'll not be holding my breath for it to become real. MIT is basically a meme at this point with regards to press releases that don't manifest into reality.

[–] WiseThat@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

For a basement with a 5-inch slab and exterior walls are 8 inches, 8ft high and also concrete... Then 45 cubic meters is about what you'd need.

Of course, your basement walls are about as electrically grounded as it gets, so I doubt you'd be able to store power in them. One leak and you're discharging all that power into the groundwater.

So, feasible amount. Just needs isolating and could replace expensive batteries for solar?

[–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

naturally it depends on the walls and house layout, but just to have an idea: assuming a concrete thickness of 20cm and 4 external walls of 20m x 3m each:

0.2 * 4 * 20 * 3 = 48m^3

probably in the 100-200m^3 ballpark if we count internal walls, which are thinner, but cover more total length.

And I know walls are usually not pure concrete, but functions like energy storage could very well change how we build them.

[–] mlc894@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

I wonder if the foundation of the house would be convenient for this… that much concrete is equivalent to a cube of side length around 10 feet, which seems to at least be in the ballpark for the total amount of concrete in a foundation. I think?

[–] WetBeardHairs@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

10kWh is enough to run one 110VAC outlet at full capacity for about 10 hours. I don't know where that 10kWh figure comes from but most American houses use between 15-30kWh per day.

So that 10 foot cube would need to be closer to 15ft cubed. It's huge. Perhaps the foundation of the structure would work, as someone else mentioned.

UK average is 8 kWh / 24 hours for electricity per household of 2.4 people.

[–] zout@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

One catch is that carbon black is mostly made from fossil oil.

[–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

It's more nuanced than that. The question is whether we're just using carbon black that's already an excess byproduct of other industries, or we'd be actively producing it to make these wall batteries.

[–] ubermeisters@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

That's only because that's where we have an access currently. You can make carbon black by burning a whole lot of different things. Pretty much anything carbon-based. You don't make carbon black specifically, you harvest carbon black from other processes and refine it if needed.

[–] ericlewisauthor@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

The catch is, if it works some oil company is gonna buy it out and kill it.

[–] WarmSoda@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago

The last time this news was posted everyone tore into it. I don't remember the details, but it was funny.

It's just not feasible in reality.