this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2023
18 points (90.9% liked)

Typography & fonts

382 readers
1 users here now

A community to discuss and share information about typography and fonts

Sibling community:

!typography@lemmy.world

Rules of conduct:

The usual ones on Lemmy and Mastodon. In short: be kind or at least respectful, no offensive language, no harassment, no spam.

(Icon: detail from the title of Bringhurst's Elements of Typographic Style. Banner: details from pages 6 and 12, ibid.)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I've built a new font! Thoughts and feedback on my approach very welcome.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] edent@open-source.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The answer is... I don't know :-) Maybe both? What do you think would be best?

[โ€“] pglpm@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago

Ah, difficult, they are two different and incomparable concepts :) As they are now, I think the fonts reach the first goal: give the appearance of an old and used book. Which is cool.

For the second goal maybe there's no need to go to such lengths as you did, I imagine pictures of how those fonts looked in their time maybe exist(?).