this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2024
1047 points (78.5% liked)

Political Memes

5620 readers
2195 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Bassman1805@lemmy.world -3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

When people are employed by those corporations, they have a vested interest in their livelihood not disappearing overnight.

A survey of 700 people leaves considerable room for polling error. Without information on how they selected participants, I wouldn't say that's an overwhelming margin.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

When people are employed by those corporations,

...

The report finds that about 64,000 Pennsylvania workers are employed in fossil fuel-based industries such as natural gas drilling, coal mining, and supporting activities

https://stateimpact.npr.org/pennsylvania/2021/01/29/report-pennsylvania-stands-to-gain-243000-jobs-a-year-from-clean-energy-investment/

64k, not just fracking, that's all fossil fuel jobs in PA.

There's 12.7 million people in the state

0.5% of people in the state work any job connected to fossil fuels....

You're confusing corporations and people homie.

A survey of 700 people leaves considerable room for polling error

You didn't have to tell us you never learned about stats in any educational setting, but I appreciate the transparency.

700 is more than enough

[–] Bassman1805@lemmy.world -5 points 2 months ago

700 people is a good sample size if they are a truly random representative sample of your population. In real life, polling error tends to vary far more than 1/sqrt(n) because of systemic biases in how you select participants. Depending on how the survey was conducted, it could intrinsically favor certain demographics.