this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2024
9 points (100.0% liked)

NZ Politics

561 readers
1 users here now

Kia ora and welcome to the NZ Politics community!

This is a place for respectful discussions about everything that's political and kiwi

This is an inclusive space where diverse opinions are valued, but please don't be a dick

Other kiwi communities here

 

Banner image by Tom Ackroyd, CC-BY-SA

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Companies and shareholders associated with 12 fast-track projects gave more than $500,000 in political donations to National, Act and New Zealand First and their candidates, RNZ analysis shows.

The projects include a quarry extension into conservation land and a development whose owner was publicly supported by National MPs during a legal battle with Kāinga Ora.

University of Otago legal expert Professor Andrew Geddis said the Cabinet Manual doesn't cover whether receiving a donation is a conflict of interest.

In a political system where a lot of the money used for campaigning comes from private sources, it would be difficult to bar parties from being involved in decisions which impact donors.

"The unions give lots of money to the Labour Party. If that was then to mean that the Labour Party couldn't pass workplace relations legislation that impacts on unions, it would take a huge policy issue just out of play."

If this was the rule, donors wouldn't donate, he said.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TagMeInSkipIGotThis@lemmy.nz 3 points 1 month ago

Let's also not forget how much money National & Act raised from the Real Estate & Transport industries this election either.

Both of those are already being rewarded with the payment for their donations. Hell of an investment for the landlords really, a few mil to elect Luxon and Seymour, and in return be given a multi-billion dollar tax break.