this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2024
632 points (73.7% liked)

Political Memes

5405 readers
5139 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] GBU_28@lemm.ee 12 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Trump's track record and intentions for his next term are crystal clear. They are clearly and demonstrably worse than harris'plans or Biden/harris' previous term.

That info is widely available. To ignore it now, and claim to need "convincing" is madness at best, or bad faith at worst.

[–] knightly@pawb.social 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I already wasn't going to vote for Trump, so threatening me with him doesn't make me want to vote for Democrats, it makes me want both parties to lose.

[–] GBU_28@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

No offense but taking it as "threatening" and not understanding that I've of them WILL win is comically short sighted.

Folks aren't trying to find someone a date, they're explaining the consequences of a FPTP election with limited possible outcomes.

Needing to be handled with kid gloves is privileged

[–] knightly@pawb.social 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

No offense, but saying "support my candidate or else the bad man will win" and not understanding that people will see this as a threat is comically bad public relations.

Folks aren't looking for someone to vote against, they're looking for someone to vote for.

Needing to be handled with kid gloves so you don't have to face the weakness of your own rhetoric is privileged.

[–] GBU_28@lemm.ee 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If you don't get being in a constrained system there's nothing else to discuss. Decide for yourself on who of the two candidates you want, and vote to empower either. Even inaction has a consequence.

[–] knightly@pawb.social 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

I work in cybersecurity, finding ways to break out of "constrained systems" is literally my job.

I also already voted, I'm just not pretending that American "democracy" is anything other than a process for legitimizing an Imperial state.

The voters have no agency, the only people who do are those who constrained the available options to "bad" and "worse". But you're trying to hold those people blameless by insisting that voters are answerable to the party rather than the other way around. The Democrats can't fail, they can only be failed by potential voters who are insufficiently terrified of their "opponents".

The Democrats only need a Republican stick so that they don't have to offer us more carrots, the right move is to stop being a donkey and farm our own carrots.

Let the parties die, the Republican party will collapse to infighting after Trump loses anyway.

[–] GBU_28@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Do you have a plan to effectively break out of the constrained system in the next 10 days? If not, it's all academic