this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2024
67 points (94.7% liked)

MeanwhileOnGrad

1339 readers
187 users here now

"Oh, this is calamity! Calamity! Oh no, he's on the floor!"

Welcome to MoG!


Meanwhile On Grad


Documenting hate speech, conspiracy theories, apologia/revisionism, and general tankie behaviour across the fediverse. Memes are welcome!


What is a Tankie?


Alternatively, a detailed blog post about Tankies.

(caution of biased source)


Basic Rules:

Sh.itjust.works Instance rules apply! If you are from other instances, please be mindful of the rules. — Basically, don't be a dick.

Hate-Speech — You should be familiar with this one already; practically all instances have the same rules on hate speech.

Apologia(Using the Modern terminology for Apologia) No Defending, Denying, Justifying, Bolstering, or Differentiating authoritarian acts or endeavours, whether be a Pro-CCP viewpoint, Stalinism, Islamic Terrorism or any variation of Tankie Ideology.

Revisionism — No downplaying or denying atrocities past and present. Calling Tankies shills, foreign/federal agents, or bots also falls under this rule. Extremists exist. They are real. Do not call them shills or fake users as it handwaves their extremism.

Tankies can explain their views but may be criticised or attacked for them. Any slight infraction on the rules above will immediately earn a warning and possibly a ban.

Off-topic Discussion — Do not discuss unrelated topics to the point of derailing the thread. Stay focused on the direct content of the post as opposed to arguing.

You'll be warned if you're violating the instance and community rules. Continuing poor behaviour after being warned will result in a ban or removal of your comments. Bans typically only last 24 hours, but each subsequent infraction will double the amount. Depending on the content, the ban time may be increased. You may request an unban at any time.


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Thou shalt not criticise the Russian invasion of Ukraine on .ml

https://cdn.imgchest.com/files/84apcmz2dz4.png

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

where they weren't involved

He was. Several times. I never "stalked" him in the slightest. With all due respect, lying through your teeth that you're not pro-Russian while actively posting pro-Russian propaganda and then having a tantrum and banning anyone who notes you're being irrational is pretty rude.

This notion of politeness in this way, in the context of actual disinformation, doesn't really work. You can't expect me to be polite to someone who advocates for crimes against humanity, can you?

[–] Skua@kbin.earth 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah, it is rude, but you're also making him right to accuse you of harassing behaviour if you're doing this

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

If I mention his nickname once a month when the topic of disinformation actors on his specific instance comes up?

No, I'm not. That is not harassment in any way. I don't stalk his profile, I don't follow his posts or comments. I just know of him.

Mentioning a username does not harassment constitute.

[–] Skua@kbin.earth 2 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Okay, let me rephrase then: if anyone ever tagged me four times on one post for no reason other than to argue with me, I would block that person

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

no reason other than to argue with me

What do you think forums are for?

I really don't care whether yo... he blocks me, as he doesn't engage in good faith debate, but pretend to. He pretends to be an American, denies the existence of Russian propaganda, says that Ukraine is committing a genocide bt defending against the Russian invasion, and very often inserts himself into discussions of American politics, as an American.

One of the clearest Russian trolls I've ever seen. I don't care what he thinks of me, personally. I care about fighting disinformation. You don't...?

[–] PuddleOfKittens@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 weeks ago

The point isn't to argue I think, it's to inform others that he's not credible (and he's free to 'defend' himself via argument of course).

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 1 points 3 weeks ago

That's your right. But yeah I don't think tagging somebody who is. Being discussed is harassment. It is not direct. Other person can ignore or block.

People need to keep the record straight tho. They have a right to their shilling, we have a right to document that we disagree and provide our side of the story.

Whole point of censorship is not permit the other side to respond.