this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2024
633 points (73.7% liked)

Political Memes

5401 readers
6362 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works -2 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

voting for a third party is fine.

I personally think it's impractical since the democrats have advanced progressive policies these past 4 years that probably dovetail with any third party candidate a voter likes, but any vote an American voter casts is a valid vote.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org -1 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Third party vote is a protest vote to deny the regime legitimacy.

Voting for either party is a vote of confidence in the regime. It only makes sense to participate within this framework if you feel like you benefiting from the current arrangements.

[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

When I vote for a third party, I am voting for the candidate I most strongly identify with.

you know, like in a democracy.

"Voting for either party is a vote of confidence in the regime."

this is incredibly naive.

voting third party as a "protest" is like holding your hand under a blowtorch.

yeah, you'll get some attention, but it's not really going to help you out and you probably didn't have a good reason for doing it in the first place.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org -1 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

It will only work if enough people do it to rattle the current arrangement.

I am doing my part. Some day others will join. This a generation long battle and the only valiable option to influence the system.

Voting for either party is saying you are fine with the way the regime rules us. You are not going to get result by playing by their rules.

[–] positiveWHAT@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago

I think it would be more effective to start an election reform faction inside the Dems rather than abstain the vote for democracy against dictatorship.

[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works -1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

"It will only work if enough people do it to rattle the current arrangement."

maybe. No evidence for that, though.

"I am doing my part."

maybe. No evidence for that, though.

"Some day others will join."

I'm not even sure what you're talking about. Bullying voters? Someday people will join you bullying voters? All your MAGA peers are in lockstep with you, you have millions of fascists willing to hold your hand.

"Voting for either party is saying you are fine with the way the regime rules us"

Incorrect, you have a naive, narrow, flawed understanding of electoral freedom.

I don't like the way the US government conducts itself.

That has nothing to do with choosing the better Presidential candidate according to my values.

This year, Harris will make a better President according to my values.

If Stein would, I'd vote for her. But she wouldn't.

Voting is valid, freedom of choice is valid.

Your bullying won't work here.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Bullying? You got a citation?

[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works -1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Yes, read above.

or try a dictionary.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I don't think you know what that term means

[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

makes sense, considering your blind faith in ignorance.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 weeks ago
[–] axx@slrpnk.net 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

This is a perspective than can only be held in a political system that has devolved to a two-party system.

If you step out of that, it stops making sense. A democracy allows for people to express their actual opinion. Anything less than that is not a proper democracy. I'd argue there are no "third parties" in a proper democracy.

You might be saying that the American regime is illegitimate, it's unclear.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 1 points 3 weeks ago

You might be saying that the American regime is illegitimate, it's unclear.

Regime manufacturers legitimacy via captured political process and peasants accept this arrangement despite not being represented within the government broadly speaking is my thesis.