this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2024
899 points (95.6% liked)

Political Memes

5405 readers
4987 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] draneceusrex@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

If Harris started saying "from the river to the sea" at her rallies, she'd drop 10 points overnight. If she was still for a ban on fraking, she'd lose Pennsylvania by 10 points. Cheney is really a waste of energy but a non- factor.

[–] Talisker@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] timewarp@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago

If she loses she'll just blame everyone but herself like Democrats always do. Obama is already trying to blame black men saying they are chauvinistic.

[–] draneceusrex@lemmy.world -1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

And she'd drop 5 more points in Michigan if she started the "from river to the sea" shit from her base that she would lose, even with 100% of the state's Muslims supporting her.

[–] timewarp@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Why is the only other logical choice in your mind that Kamala must either support genocide or spread antisemtic statements? How in the world do you see that as the only two logical options?

[–] draneceusrex@lemmy.world -1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I don't. I want us to cease funding offensive weapons, while still helping to fund the Iron Dome and to defend Isreal if they are attacked. That'd lose her 20 points in the polls because being nuanced would just piss off both sides, especially moderates. She would need real political capital to do so, and I hope that's her play once elected. It's obvious she can't show her cards on this till elected. Do I like the country's political balls being held by AIPAC? No. But it's the reality we live in.

[–] timewarp@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago

A majority of Americans disapprove of Israeli action in Gaza:

https://news.gallup.com/poll/642695/majority-disapprove-israeli-action-gaza.aspx

I'm not sure where this narrative is coming from that it is an unpopular opinion to stand up to Netanyahu.

[–] timewarp@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Being against genocide in Gaza is a populist statement and position. So are things like sensible regulations and remembering what happened in Flint, Michigan. This whole, "you must either be for genocide or an antisemite" claim you got going on isn't a good look.

[–] draneceusrex@lemmy.world -1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

And no one has done the polling in the Harris camp... the first priority is to protect our democracy. We won't be able to do anything about helping the Palestinians if Trump is elected. But I am sure you'll be happy you stuck to your moral high horse when millions of undocumented are put in camps themselves if the Felon wins along with when so many other atrocities start up here on US soil. Good for you!

[–] timewarp@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

She's now losing in Michigan. I'm not sure what evidence you need before the election. I'm not really enthusiastic about a candidate that needs to wait to see how supporting genocide affects her electability.