this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2024
-8 points (36.7% liked)

Privacy

833 readers
14 users here now

Privacy is the ability for an individual or group to seclude themselves or information about themselves, and thereby express themselves selectively.

Rules

  1. Don't do unto others what you don't want done unto you.
  2. No Porn, Gore, or NSFW content. Instant Ban.
  3. No Spamming, Trolling or Unsolicited Ads. Instant Ban.
  4. Stay on topic in a community. Please reach out to an admin to create a new community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Image Transcription:

WHAT WILL A CASHLESS SOCIETY MEAN?

THE PROS

CONVENIENCE — THERE WILL NO LONGER BE ANY NEED TO CARRY CASH AROUND

THE CONS

EVERY TRANSACTION YOU MAKE WILL BE TRACKED YOUR SPENDING HABITS CAN BE LINKED TO YOUR CARBON FOOTPRINT

YOU WILL ONLY BE PERMITTED TO SPEND ON THINGS THE GOVERNMENT APPROVES OF. THINGS THAT ARE DEEMED TO BE LUXURIES — MEAT, FUEL, TRAVEL — CAN BE RESTRICTED

YOUR MONEY CAN BE PROGRAMMED WITH AN EXPIRY DATE — IF YOU DON’T SPEND IT BY A CERTAIN DATE, YOU'LL LOSE IT

THERE WILL BE NO ‘BLACK’ ECONOMY. IT WILL NOT BE POSSIBLE TO AVOID TAX, BUT THEN YOU WILL NOT BE ABLE TO GIVE POCKET MONEY TO CHILDREN OR GRANDCHILDREN AND NEITHER WILL YOU BE ABLE TO BORROW OR LEND MONEY TO FRIENDS WITHOUT THAT BEING TAXED BY THE GOVERNMENT

PARKING AND SPEEDING FINES WILL BE TAKEN AT SOURCE, WITHOUT THE POSSIBILITY OF CHALLENGE AND POSSIBLY EVEN WITHOUT YOUR KNOWLEDGE

IF YOU PROTEST THE ACTIONS OF THE GOVERNMENT, YOUR MONEY CAN BE SWITCHED OFF. IF YOU THINK THAT’S UNLIKELY, IT’S ALREADY HAPPENED TO TENS OF THOUSANDS OF CANADIANS WHEN THEY PROTESTED AND IT ALSO HAPPENED TO A BRITISH JOURNALIST

A CASHLESS SOCIETY MEANS THE END OF HUMAN FREEDOM

IF YOU WANT THAT, DO NOTHING

IF YOU DON'T, THE FIRST THING YOU MUST DO IS RESPOND TO THE GOVERNMENT'S PROPOSAL ON DIGITAL ID, UPON WHICH A CASHLESS SOCIETY MUST BE BASED

https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/draft-legislation-to-help-more-people-prove-their- identity-online/consultation-on-draft-legislation-to-support-identity-verificat

Image Credit: Brett Scott

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

To defend a liberty is to defend said liberty for your enemies. You cannot possibly be arguing its ok to restrict some peoples rights without the court ruling on it.

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The courts literally were involved. Also, who was restricting rights? The clownvoy or the people in downtown ottawa? Hint it was the clownvoy.

[–] muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Did the courts order that people would have their money disabled. If not thats denying someone their right to do as they wish with their private property. Also how can a court order somthibg like this dont u need to be charged with a crime first.

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Why can't I fucking drive my car on a sidewalk! The government is denying my right to do as I wish with my private property! Why can't I make bombs at home! Fucking government!

We've only ever been allowed to do what we want with our stuff within reason, that is how society works.

And no you don't need to be charged with a crime fist, for example a warrant is done before charges are laid. Civil forfeiture in the US is another great example of it.

[–] muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

There are laws against driving on the sidewalk. There is no law sayibg the governmwnt can disable ur money whenever they please. A warrant is granted to collect evidance in cases of reasonable suspicion. Civil forfeiture is often used for abuse of police powers and breaks the rule of innocent until proven guilty is that really what u wanna be basing ur argument on? A racist rule used by cops to abuse a system for their own financial gain while violating a fundamental human right. Nice one.

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

And there are laws about how protesting works and violating those laws has penalties. Yes a warrant requires evidence, and judge, that's what I was saying, thank you for agreeing whth my point. I'm not saying civil forfeiture is just or good. But it is legal, and in your own words, there are law against driving on a side walk and civil forfeiture is legal. Nice one.

[–] muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Was their a court order to stop these peoples money working or did some agency call up the bank and the bank complied without question?

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Well, legally, if an emergency is declared, because the clownvoy didn't comply with reasonable requests. The law grants further powers to those in charge. You know to prevent further violent occupation of downtown ottawa.

[–] muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I asked a very specific question. Was there a court order to cut off the money? Stop avoiding my points engage in good faith stop giving non answers its not productive.

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Yes.

https://torontolife.com/city/ontario-froze-20-million-in-freedom-convoy-assets-now-what-we-asked-monique-jilesen-the-toronto-based-lawyer-who-filed-the-injunction/

I'm not avoiding your point giving non answers. I'm saying there is a system in place that allows stuff like this to happen, the entire point of this back and forth. You're the one who keeps moving the goal posts.