this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2024
168 points (93.3% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7215 readers
233 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
pangyuehung@lemmy.ml
yogthos@lemmy.ml
168
Cards Against Humanity continue to bring good into the world (sopuli.xyz)
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by UnhingedStopa@sopuli.xyz to c/usa@lemmy.ml
19 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

taken from boardgames@sopuli.xyz

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

But the law also includes this language:

Whoever makes or offers to make an expenditure to any person, either to vote… or to vote for…

I take that to mean to pay someone to vote, or to vote for someone. And in this case, CAH is definitely paying people to vote.

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 29 points 1 month ago

The reward is specifically for people to come up with a plan on how they would vote. The reward isn't technically contingent on someone acting on that plan.

[–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 27 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Legally speaking they're not paying people to vote, only to do voting-adjacent tasks which is legal

The Register went into the more detail on the legality of it all

[–] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Thank you. Im glad to be wrong, and it’s good to see someone dissecting this issue.

[–] 314xel@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

They're paying people to apologize for not voting last time. What that means is up for the reader. Not the same.