Libraries

491 readers

1 users here now

For talk of all things related to libraries!

Please follow this instances rules.

To find more communities on this instance, go to: !411@literature.cafe

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

gabe@literature.cafe

Removing Books From Libraries Often Takes Debate. But There’s a Quieter Way. (www.nytimes.com)

submitted 1 month ago by CyberpunkLibrarian@lemmy.ml to c/libraries@literature.cafe

6 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Here's an archive.is link for those who need it.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (2 children)

TLDR: people are damaging books they want removed from the library. These books are pulled from circulation as part of a process called “weeding”.

But when books are weeded, a fresh copy is ordered to replace it. So this vandalism isn’t really accomplishing anything.

[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

If the same books are constantly getting destroyed, the library may consider no longer replacing them in order to avoid the cost.

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Might work with books copies of which can no longer be obtained. Besides, vandalism as a vigilantism looks pretty poor stance to me

Edit: now that I gave it more thought, vandalism is sometimes the only way to express oppressed views. But I am against specifically secretly damaging communal books